Shame on Audi for not having LATCH points

Anyone who's dealt much with infant seats and child car seats knows of the various ways to attach the seat to the car. The best way is via LATCH anchor points (LATCH is the contrived acronym for “Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren”), which became mandatory on all new cars sold in the US since Sep 2002, although most new cars had them years before that.

In other parts of the world, these anchor points are called ISOFIX, and they've been around for quite some time. For example, an article at Audi Japan from 1999 states that the ISOFIX anchor points are standard across their entire line of cars.

Thus, it was to my great surprise that we test drove two different 2006 Audis today and found that not only did neither have the anchor points, but the sales guy had no idea what I was talking about.

Fumie is going to get her Japanese driver's license, so we're thinking of a second car -- something a bit more mature than the soccer-mom Toyota Sienta we've had for the last two years (which, by the way, has the LATCH anchors). Today we checked out the Audi A3 Sportback and the Audi A4 Avant (wagon). They weren't bad, but were surprisingly unthrilling.

My biggest disappointment was that cruise control is not even available on the A3. It's available on the A4 as part of a Bose stereo upgrade (which seems strange).

But the oddest thing was the lack of LATCH / ISOFIX anchor points. Not only that, but the A3's rear three-point belts weren't even the locking type. Normally, if you pull a belt slowly it gives. This allows you to adjust it. If you pull it quickly (as if in an accident), it locks. This keeps you safe. This is all fine for people, but the “it gives” bit is not appropriate for anchoring a car seat. So, modern (in the last 15-20 years?) seat belts have a feature whereby if you pull it all the way out, it gets into a locked mode whereby it can tighten but can not loosen until it's unbuckled. This allows you to securely anchor a car seat, and until LATCH came along was the best way.

Anyway, back to today, the A3's rear belts didn't have that “tighten only” feature. These antiquated belts are the worst type for a car seat, and can't even be used by some car seats. Luckily, our seat (Britax Marathon) has a special feature such that it can be sued with these lame belts.

But shame on you Audi. Just shame on you.


Timing a Transcend 80x 4GB Compact Flash card with a Nikon D200

This post details some speed tests I did with my Nikon D200 and a Transcend brand 80x 4 GB compact flash card. It's mostly a writeup for Digital Photography Review, and likely of little interest to the regular reader (is there more than one?) of my blog.

I'm sure that Digital Photography Review will do many timing tests when the D200 is reviewed, but I suspect that a Transcend memory card will not be tested. Since Transcend cards are significantly cheaper than San Disk and Lexar (at least here in Japan, where a 4 gig San Disk Extreme III runs about US$900), I wanted to report on the Transcend. The tested card's model number is TS4GCF80 and its serial number is 129002-0143.

All tests were done with a newly-formatted card with the camera in manual-focus, manual-exposure (1/200, wide-open aperture) mode at ISO 1600. Measurements were taken from audio-recordings using Adobe Audition.

Summary

Image Format Initial frames at 5 fpsSubsequent Frames Total Frames in One Minute
Raw/NEF 22 2.2 sec/frame 48
Raw/NEF (Compressed)22 1.5 sec/frame 60
JPG (Large/Fine) 27 0.76 sec/frame102
JPG (Small/Basic) 150 0.25 sec/frame270

With the first test (uncompressed NEF), all files are sized at the same 15.6 megabytes. Assuming that the bottleneck for the “subsequent frames” speed is the card's write speed, one can surmise that the Transcend 80x 4GB card can be written at 7.23 MB/sec.

[UPDATE: In a subsequent post, I now have also tested the 120x version of this card]

Details

NOTE: the D200 automatically aborts its high-speed continuous shooting mode (“CH” mode) after 100 frames. You'll see this mentioned in the last two sets of details below.

Writing non-compressed NEF files produced these results:

  • Initial burst of 21 frames at 0.20 seconds each
  • 22nd frame came after a 0.129 second stutter (that is, 0.329 seconds after start of 21st frame)
  • Then 26 additional frames at an evenly spaced 2.156 seconds/frame
  • Total of 48 frames in 58.4 seconds (49 frames in 60.49 seconds)

Writing compressed NEF files produced these results:

  • Initial burst of 22 frames at 0.20 seconds each
  • 23rd frame came after a 0.6 second stutter (that is, 0.8 seconds after start of 22nd frame)
  • Then 37 additional frames at an evenly-spaced 1.473 seconds/frame
  • Total of 60 frames in 59.5 seconds (51 frames in 61.0 seconds)

Writing JPGs in Fine/Large format (Quality Priority) produced these results:

  • Initial burst of 27 frames at 0.20 seconds each
  • 28th frame came after a 0.212 second stutter (that is, 0.412 seconds after start of 27th frame)
  • Then 7 frames at 0.5 seconds each
  • Then 65 frames at an occasionally erratic pace, at an average of 0.758 seconds each
  • Total of 100 frames in 58.4 sec, at which point the continuous shoot stopped
  • Would be a total of 102 frames in 59.92 seconds

Writing JPGs in Basic/Small format (Size Priority) produced these results:

  • Initial burst of 100 frames at 0.20 seconds each (then auto-abort)
  • Restarting immediately saw the 5 fps rate continue for an overall total of 150 frames
  • Subsequent frames were at 4 fps.
  • Effective rate of 270 in 60 seconds.

Popular Cameras in Japan; Trip to Yodobashi Camera

I'll write about my new camera, a Nikon D200, in the near future (here's a preview: it rocks!), but here's a pic I took during my trip to Yodobashi Camera, one of the largest camera stores in Japan (total space over its six floors must be about the same as a typical Wal Mart or Home Depot)

Notice a prevailing theme? 🙂

I'd gone to pick up a few things, such as a camera bag and a tripod.

For bags, a friend had strongly recommended the Tamrac Velocity 7, but I found it not at all what I wanted. It looks to be very nice indeed for hiking and perhaps bicycling, but at this stage I'm looking for something just for when I'm out and about with Fumie and Anthony, so a more traditional shoulder-slung or fanny-pack style is in order.

I didn't find anything at all that I liked (and the store had many many different brands from dozens of makers). With many of them, I wondered if the designers had ever actually used the bag in real life, because many had serious (yet obvious) drawbacks. Even the Tamrac had its issues -- the handle was on the cover flap, so you can't safely carry by the handle unless you completely snap the plastic buckle. What a hassle.

In the end, I got something that should be fine for out-and-about use, a Lowepro Nova 1 AW. It's about as small a bag as I can get my D200 in and still have a tad bit room left for perhaps an extra lens or a spare battery. But it's not perfect, either. The shoulder strap is very nice (nicely padded), but it attaches on the bag at the mid-depth point, not at the back where it can allow the bag to lie flat against your hip. Luckily, there are two tiny little ribbon-fabric loops there that I can jimmyrig the shoulder strap to, thereby allowing a smooth, natural lie.

About the size, the D200 is big, so it really doesn't fit easily into these small/medium-sized bags, including the Tamrac mentioned above. My friend who likes it so much has the much more huge Nikon D2x mentioned in a prior post. Jason, how on earth to you fit it in there?


Velbon ULTRA MAXi F
with feet not extended

For a tripod, I wanted something light and quick to set up -- something light enough that I'll actually take it out with me, and easy enough to set up and use that I'll actually not find it a bother to do so. I ended up buying the 0.99kg (2.2 lb) Velbon ULTRA-MAXi-F, which has a fairly innovative locking mechanism in the legs. At its most compact it's 14.2" long, but give each leg a short twist and you can pull out the four telescoping parts to create legs almost 60 inches long. It's very quick.

Here's their English site's description of it, upon which I could not possibly hope to improve:

Upgrade from ULTRA MAXi having new function to obtain low angle. F means Flat in this context. DIRECT CONTACT PIPE. Minimum height 16.5cm, maximum height 155 cm. 4-WAY head PH-237Q has swing function 90 degree to right and left. Quick release platform is very much thinner but it is made of Aluminum to maintain durability. Tripod carrying case is attached. “Tripod to go” has come true at your hand!

I'd also wanted a big rubber viewfinder eyepiece cup, so that I could get better light shielding when I bring the viewfinder up to my eye, but they didn't have anything like that. (Nikon doesn't sell one, and there are no third-party ones that they know of).


Got my D200!

I got a wonderful surprise today when I got a call from my friend Katsunori Shimada. We'd talked earlier in the day (after our workout -- we do the elliptical trainer and weight training a few times a week at a local club) about how there's a worldwide shortage of Nikon's new digital SLR. I'd ordered a Nikon D200 a week or so ago, and at the time the shop had no idea when it might come in (could be two days, or could be two months). Since then, reading online forums, I've found out that they're in short supply worldwide.

It's a bit frustrating having no idea even how many people are in front of me in line, so Shimada-san kindly agreed to call to find out. Well, it turns out that the camera body was already in! This information, of course, was the aforementioned wonderful surprise. Slightly dampening it, though, was that the lens I ordered at the same time wouldn't arrive until mid February.

Well, since my previous camera broke and is at the shop, I've been without a reasonable camera lately. The timing is particularly bad because this past weekend one of my neighbors from Cupertino visited (stopping buy Japan on his way to Nairobi, London, and Ireland). It would have been nice to have a camera.

I called the shop to confirm that indeed my D200 body was waiting for me, and without much time left before I had to pick Anthony up at daycare, I hightailed it on my bicycle down to the Teramachi electric shopping district, 15 or so minutes away (but the way I was flying today, it was half that). Along the way I had to find a bank or convenience store to withdraw the money, and this turned into more of a hassle than I wanted (involving returning home to get a forgotten bank card), but in the end I was able to get what I needed. (Unlike ATMs in America, there are much higher daily withdraw limits in Japan. When it's a non-bank-specific one such as at a convenience store, the limit is usually $1,000 or $2,000, but I've been able to pull $2,500 from the convenience store near us, so I don't even know what their limit is.)

So, I picked up my D200 body. It turns out that they'd tried to call me a number of times (or so they claim). I wonder why I didn't get the messages. Anyway, I asked how many of these they get in a week, and the guy said that it's not measured that way (they can go weeks without getting any... they trickle in when they come in). The only reason I got mine now is because someone else canceled. Otherwise, I'd still be waiting (but, presumably, be next in line).

Here's a note that will mean nothing unless you're looking for this information: Bought in Kyoto, Japan. Serial number is 2011199. The box and manual pack have “AJ” stickers on them. The manual has “jp” in the upper corner (and is, of course, in Japanese -- I've downloaded the English version from Nikon's web site).

Just as with many electronic shops, Joshin Denki offers “points” with most purchases -- basically, it's credit back that you can use for purchases later. In this case, I got about $160 back, and on a whim used $90 of it to buy a four-year extension to the one-year Nikon warranty. It's probably money well wasted (at least, I hope it will be), but I consider it free since I used the points . I also used $30 worth to get a printer ink cartridge I'd been needing. I still have enough left to get a camera bag, or something, I suppose.

Anyway, there remained the issue of a lens. I bought the body only, so needed a lens if I wanted to actually use it. They had a very small selection of lenses -- a few Nikon and a few Nikon-fit Tamron lenses. I would have loved a somewhat fast short-range zoom (say, in the 16-60 range) because I'd still want it even after getting the slow 18-200 on order, but they had nothing really appropriate. What they did have was close, but I didn't want to spent $500 on something “close”, so after much hemming and hawing, I decided to not get the lens there. I thought I might go pick up Anthony and then take a drive somewhere to get one.

But, while at the checkout, I got a text message from Shimada-san suggesting that the lens selection would be better at a nearby camera store (since the place I was at sold mostly computers, and had only minimal camera stuff). Time was getting tight, but I stopped by and indeed they had a wide range of lenses (Nikon, Sigma, Tamron), and also a quite a lot of used ones. After much (much!) hemming and hawing, since I'm really quite out of my element, I spent $90 and got a used Nikon AF 28-80 f/3.3-5.6 zoom. At f/3.3 it's not very fast, but it'll suit me fine for a while until I can decide on a good short/medium zoom. They buy used equipment, and if they give me $50 for it in the summer, for example, then it's like renting it for 30 cents a day. I can live with that.

So now it's 9:45pm and I've taken the D200 out of the box but have done nothing so far other than ogle it. Now the fun begins....

UPDATE: my first shot, the toy-strewn top of Anthony's play stove...


Lots of snow in Niigata, some snow in Kyoto

Clearing snow in Niigata
from Yahoo! Japan News

Niigata (新潟) is an area of Japan that's gotten a lot of snow -- more than 12 feet (3.8 meters) so far this year. Yesterday on the news I saw a video of a tiny car driving down the street, with accumulated snow still on its roof. The snow was at least as tall above the top of the car as the car itself was tall above the road (about four and a half feet each, I'd guess). Someone had chiseled this thing out of a snowbank, cleared the snow from the hood and windows, and left all the snow on the roof. What had previously been a tiny car was now nine or ten feet tall. It was both impressive and comical. I searched on the web for a similar still photo, but couldn't find it.

We were supposed to have gotten some snow ourselves last night, so I was surprised to wake up to find just a few flakes falling. By the countable flakes on a car roof I could see, it had apparently just started snowing. When I next glanced out some 20 minutes later, I was again surprised, this time to see a thick blanket of white.

Of course, my camera is broken and my new one is still on order, but here's a shot from our last snow which approximates what we have now:

I hope we get a pleasantly pretty blanket that stays for a while, as my old neighbor from Cupertino is arriving tonight with his adult son on the first leg of an around the world trip. They're in Kyoto for about 40 hours, then in Tokyo for a couple days, then Nairobi, Ireland, and London