{"id":951,"date":"2008-10-01T13:16:31","date_gmt":"2008-10-01T04:16:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/2008-10-01\/951"},"modified":"2008-10-01T13:16:31","modified_gmt":"2008-10-01T04:16:31","slug":"updates-on-my-paypal-and-apple-woes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/2008-10-01\/951","title":{"rendered":"Updates on My PayPal and Apple Woes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n<p>Last month I posted about a <a\nhref=\"\/blog\/2008-09-04\/926\">Surreal (and exceedingly\nunpleasant) PayPal Experience<\/a>, and also about an <a\nhref=\"\/blog\/2008-09-26\/947\">Apple customer-service\nfiasco<\/a> coincidentally related to PayPal, but unrelated to the first\nissue. <span class='nobr'>The common<\/span> theme among both unpleasant customer experiences was\n\"<b>policies that make no sense, combined with explanations that make no\nsense<\/b>.\"<\/p>\n\n<p>Through an almost serendipitous chain of events, <span class='nobr'>I received<\/span> <span class='nobr'>a phone<\/span> call\ntoday from Mike Vergara, Director of Account Protection at PayPal (featured\nin <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.networkworld.com\/news\/2008\/020408-paypal-email-authentication.html\">this\narticle<\/a>), who shed light on both experiences.<\/p>\n\n<p>The summary for both situations is this: there is <span class='nobr'>a reasonable<\/span> basis for\nthe policies <span class='nobr'>I was<\/span> running into, but the communication about them was,\nindeed, woefully bad.<\/p>\n\n<p>About my <a class='quiet'\nhref=\"\/blog\/2008-09-04\/926\">PayPal experience<\/a>, Mike\nexplained the chain of events that led to PayPal wanting to further\nauthenticate that <span class='nobr'>I was<\/span> who <span class='nobr'>I claimed<\/span> to be. <span class='nobr'>It was a<\/span> bit complex, but once\nexplained, it made complete sense.<\/p>\n\n<p>Had they explained this at the time, there would have been no problem\nand no ill feelings. <span class='nobr'>The real problem<\/span>, he readily offered, was that the\ncommunication from PayPal was horrible from the very start. <span class='nobr'>He apologized<\/span> for that, was embarrassed by it, and (this is what means the most to me)\nlisted his &#8220;take away&#8221; points from having read my experiences. This means\nthat someone who has <span class='nobr'>a direct<\/span> impact on how all customers are treated has\nlearned something valuable from my specific experience. This will have no\ndirect impact on me or my account, but <i>wow<\/i>, the feeling that someone\nat the top is clueful brings general hope. (Sad reality: those at the top\nare often <a href=\"\/blog\/2006-03-29\/168\">not\nclueful<\/a>.)<\/p>\n\n<p>About my Apple experience, <span class='nobr'>I had wondered<\/span> why Apple required that my\nPayPal account be linked to <span class='nobr'>a credit<\/span> card before Apple would let me use\nthat PayPal account to pay for iTunes purchases. <span class='nobr'>My thought<\/span> was that PayPal\nknows right at the time-of-sale whether <span class='nobr'>I have<\/span> the funds, and so Apple can\ndecline the purchase if the funds are not there at the time of sale. Mike\ndoesn't work for Apple, but was able to shed light on this as well...<\/p>\n\n<p>It turns out that for business reasons that make complete fiscal sense,\nApple does not necessarily instigate\/complete the payment portion of <span class='nobr'>a sale<\/span>\n<i>at the time of the sale<\/i>. <span class='nobr'>If I end<\/span> up making several purchases over\nthe course of an hour\/day\/week, Apple can save <span class='nobr'>a non<\/span>-trivial amount of\nfinancial overhead by processing the payment for the combined group, as\nopposed to processing each payment individually. <span class='nobr'>The difference<\/span> would not\nmake <span class='nobr'>a material<\/span> difference if the per-item prices were large, but with\nprices as low as 99 cents, saving on the per-transaction charge is\nhuge.<\/p>\n\n<p>As an Apple shareholder, <span class='nobr'>I appreciate<\/span> this big savings. <span class='nobr'>I'm sure it<\/span>'s\ndifficult to strike <span class='nobr'>a balance<\/span> between policies that help the bottom line at\nthe expense of increased hassles for some customers (and clearly, no one\nwill ever be able to please everyone), but <span class='nobr'>I think<\/span> everyone would agree\nthat the <a class='quiet'\nhref=\"\/blog\/2008-09-26\/947\">ridiculous customer-service\nexchange<\/a> creates <span class='nobr'>a no<\/span>-win situation. Again, if they'd just communicate\nbetter, offering <span class='nobr'>a clear<\/span> rationale for their policies, so much hassle and\nill will could be averted.<\/p>\n\n<p>Perhaps not many people fall into my situation (wanting to make iTunes\npurchases without involving <span class='nobr'>a credit<\/span> card), but if Apple considers it <span class='nobr'>a\nproblem<\/span> they'd like to solve, an easy way around everything would be to\nallow <span class='nobr'>a PayPal<\/span> customer to initiate <span class='nobr'>a payment<\/span> to Apple to create <span class='nobr'>a credit<\/span>\nbalance in the customer's iTunes account. PayPal would charge <span class='nobr'>a fee<\/span> to\nApple for this, which Apple would then pass along to the user, such that,\nfor example, transferring $100 from PayPal would result in an iTunes credit\nbalance of $96. <span class='nobr'>It's a win<\/span> for the customer that wants to go that route,\nand it's <span class='nobr'>a win<\/span> for Apple (because they can now make more sales, with less\noverhead). I'll be sure to mention this idea the next time Steve Jobs calls\nme for advice. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n\n<p>In any case, <span class='nobr'>I very much<\/span> appreciate Mike's unexpected call, his\ngenerosity with his time, and the reasonable explanation of the\nsituation.<\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last month I posted about a Surreal (and exceedingly unpleasant) PayPal Experience, and also about an Apple customer-service fiasco coincidentally related to PayPal, but unrelated to the first issue. The common theme among both unpleasant customer experiences was \"<b>policies that make no sense, combined with explanations that make no sense<\/b>.\"<\/p> <p>Through an almost serendipitous chain of events, I received a phone call today from Mike Vergara, Director of Account Protection at PayPal (featured in this article), who shed light on both experiences.<\/p> <p>The summary for both situations is this: there is a reasonable basis for the policies I was running [...]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/951"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}