{"id":579,"date":"2007-09-21T22:05:19","date_gmt":"2007-09-21T13:05:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/2007-09-21\/579"},"modified":"2007-09-21T22:05:19","modified_gmt":"2007-09-21T13:05:19","slug":"tripod-stability-tests-part-iii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/2007-09-21\/579","title":{"rendered":"Tripod Stability Tests, Part III"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n

This post is a continuation of my earlier tripod-test posts:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Considerations for Building and Using a Tripod<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n
  2. Tripod Stability Tests, Part I<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Tripod Stability Tests, Part II<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Tripod Stability Tests: on Shutter Speed<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n

    Part II<\/a> compared\ndifferent equipment setups; in this post, I'll look at the same results,\nbut with an eye toward differing photo-taking techniques.<\/p>\n\n

    All images on this post were taken at f\/8, ISO 100, with a 1-second shutter speed, with a pro<\/span>-level 70-200 f\/2.8 zoom at 200mm.<\/p>\n\n

    These are all from the same test session as those presented in earlier\nposts, so all the same caveats apply.<\/p>\n\n

    We'll start with my reference setup, which is a pro<\/span>-calibar set of Gitzo\nlegs without any of the leg sections extended, no ballhead, and no center\ncolumn. (The specifics of all my components are detailed here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n\n