{"id":125,"date":"2006-01-04T12:58:35","date_gmt":"2006-01-04T03:58:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/2006-01-04\/125"},"modified":"2006-02-04T23:43:03","modified_gmt":"2006-02-04T14:43:03","slug":"ive-decided-on-a-camera","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/2006-01-04\/125","title":{"rendered":"I&#8217;ve Decided on a Camera"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n<p>\n\nSo, as per <a href=\"\/blog\/2006-01-03\/124\">my previous\npost<\/a>, <span class='nobr'>I'm considering<\/span> <span class='nobr'>a big<\/span> full-function SLR to augment my micro-sized\npoint-n-shoot <a href=\"\/blog\/2005-04-04\/4\">Canon\nSD500<\/a>. <span class='nobr'>In the last<\/span> day or so, my feeling has gone from\n&#8220;considering&#8221; to &#8220;will buy&#8221; to &#8220;have\nordered&#8221;.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nTo some extent, the decision about what to get is easier with an SLR than\nwith <span class='nobr'>a point<\/span>-n-shoot; with the latter, the choice for me involves balancing\nthree things (cost, features, size), while with an SLR it's just two (cost\nand features). Of course, with an SLR there are many, many more features. <span class='nobr'>I\ndon't<\/span> have <span class='nobr'>a lot<\/span> of &#8220;boy toys&#8221; so I'm tending to let myself\nsplurge <span class='nobr'>a bit<\/span> this time, concentrating more on features than cost...\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nSo, what features do I really care about? Of course, I'd <b>like<\/b> to\nhave the best blah blah blah, but <span class='nobr'>I don't<\/span> really <b>need<\/b> them. <span class='nobr'>In the end<\/span>, there will be (as JR says in <span class='nobr'>a comment<\/span> to my previous post) annoyances\nwith whatever <span class='nobr'>I get,<\/span> so which annoyances do <span class='nobr'>I really<\/span> want to avoid?\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nWhen it came down to it, the one thing <span class='nobr'>I really<\/span> wanted was an autofocus\nassist lamp. This is the often dim red light you see with many\npoint-n-shoots just before <span class='nobr'>a shot<\/span> is taken. <span class='nobr'>The little<\/span> bit of light helps\nthe autofocus focus before the flash fires to actually take the shot. <span class='nobr'>I also wanted<\/span> <span class='nobr'>a built<\/span>-in flash. But here's the kicker: <span class='nobr'>I want<\/span> the autofocus\nassist and flash to be <b>different<\/b>.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nAs a bit of background, it seems that SLRs that have <span class='nobr'>a built<\/span>-in flash\ngenerally have it as <span class='nobr'>a pop<\/span>-up like this:\n\n<\/p>\n\n<table align=\"center\" cellspacing=\"3\" border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: solid 1px gray\" width=\"240\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/NikonD200\/Images\/flash02-001.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"180\"\nid=\"iflash02_001\"\/><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: solid 1px gray\" width=\"240\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/NikonD200\/Images\/flash01-001.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"180\"\nid=\"iflash01_001\"\/><\/td>\n<\/tr><tr><td align=\"center\" colspan=\"2\"><small>(photos from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/nikond200\/page5.asp\">Digital Photography Review<\/a><\/small>)<\/td><\/tr><\/table>\n\n<p>\n\nYou pop the flash up when you need it, and tuck it away when you don't.\nHowever, if the camera doesn't have an autofocus-assist light, it's the\nflash that needs to provide the light. <span class='nobr'>But if the<\/span> flash isn't up, it has to\npop up automatically on its own (or, if it can't pop up on its own, it has\nto display <span class='nobr'>a warning<\/span> of some kind that the autofocus can't work without\nmore light).\n\n<\/p>\n\n<p>\n\nNow, this may sound like a small thing, and I'm sure to many people it is,\nbut it would drive me <b>absolutely batty<\/b>. When this first happened to\nme while at the store looking at the <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/canoneos350d\/\">Canon Digital Rebel\nXT<\/a>, the loud <i>kachunk<\/i> of the flash popping up on its own startled\nthe heck out of me. Once <span class='nobr'>I knew<\/span> to expect it, it merely annoyed me. <span class='nobr'>The more I<\/span> thought about it, the more <span class='nobr'>I realized<\/span> that if <span class='nobr'>I chose<\/span> that camera, <span class='nobr'>I would<\/span> regret having chosen it every time that darn flash popped up. If I'm\ngoing to drop <span class='nobr'>a big<\/span> chunk of change on <span class='nobr'>a camera,<\/span> <span class='nobr'>I don't<\/span> want to regret it\nevery day.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nSo I started looking around with <span class='nobr'>a wider<\/span> perspective, and found that the\nNikon line of digital SLRs generally have the autofocus assist light <span class='nobr'>I\ndesire.<\/span> <span class='nobr'>The main prosumer<\/span> models are the <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/nikond70\/\">D70<\/a> and the older <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/nikond100\/\">D100<\/a>, both of which\nare 6 megapixel cameras, and look very nice. <span class='nobr'>The newer<\/span> D70 has <span class='nobr'>a faster<\/span>\nshutter, larger image cache, orientation sensor (so that images can be\nauto-rotated to compensate for shots taken sideways) and <span class='nobr'>a slightly<\/span> higher\nbetter image-postview screen on the back.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nConsidering, though, that my tiny walk-around SD500 has 7.1 megapixels, it\nseems somewhat backwards to &#8220;move up&#8221; to <span class='nobr'>a smaller<\/span> size. This\nalso concerned me about the <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/konicaminolta7d\/\">Konica Minolta\nMaxxum 7D<\/a> that my sister loves so much.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nThen I found out about Nikon's just-released (hit stores <span class='nobr'>a week<\/span> ago!) <a\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/articles\/nikond200\/\">D200<\/a> and wow, it\ndidn't take long before <span class='nobr'>I knew<\/span> it was the camera for me:\n<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Strong, professional construction<\/li>\n<li>10.0 megapixel, large (1.5 crop) image sensor<\/li>\n<li>Wide ASA range (100-3200) and fast shutter (to <sup>1<\/sup>\/<small>8,000<\/small> sec)<\/li>\n<li>5 frame\/sec continuous shooting (for at least 22 raw images)<\/li>\n<li>Huge 2.5\", 235,000-pixel screen on the back<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>\n\nFrankly, <span class='nobr'>I wish it<\/span> were 8.0 megapixel instead of 10.0, since <span class='nobr'>I think<\/span> 8.0 is\nenough (both in practice, and for my mental comfort). <span class='nobr'>As it is<\/span>, the D200's\n10 megapixel raw images are 16 megabytes each! <span class='nobr'>And that doesn<\/span>'t include an\nassociated JPG you can also have made at the same time. I've never shot\nwith <span class='nobr'>a camera<\/span> that can save in raw format, but <span class='nobr'>I imagine<\/span> that if <span class='nobr'>I did,<\/span> <span class='nobr'>I'd have it<\/span> save <span class='nobr'>a small<\/span>- or medium-sized JPG as well. <span class='nobr'>I could<\/span> use the JPG\nfor easy viewing\/sorting\/filtering, yet have access to the full-size raw\ndata for those occasional really great shots. Anyway, at 20 meg for each\ncombo, <span class='nobr'>I could<\/span> get only 50 or so shots on a 1 gig card!\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nOne of the things that really sealed the Nikon decision for me is that\nNikon just came out with an 18-200 VR zoom (The VR stands for vibration\nreduction; the optical image stabilization <span class='nobr'>I mentioned<\/span> in my previous\npost). <span class='nobr'>Due to the<\/span> D200's 1.5x crop, this is equivalent to <span class='nobr'>a 27<\/span>-300 zoom for\n<span class='nobr'>a standard<\/span> 35mm SLR. However you measure it, it's an <b>11x<\/b> zoom. Wow.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nIt's only f\/3.5 at the low end and f\/5.6 at the high end, so it's <span class='nobr'>a bit<\/span>\nslower than I'd like (&#8220;slower&#8221; means that it doesn't let in as\nmuch light as some other lenses might, such as an f\/1.4 50mm lens),\nbut considering the D200s sensitivity range (ASA to 3200) and the kind of\nshots I'll be using it for (family, nature, and about town), the wide zoom\nrange makes it more than worth it. (Anyone even vaguely professional would\nprobably never make this choice, but I'm not <span class='nobr'>a professional<\/span> photographer\nand for whatever reason <span class='nobr'>I really<\/span> hate having to change lenses, so <span class='nobr'>a zoom<\/span> is\nthe way to go for me.)\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nKen Rockwell has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kenrockwell.com\/nikon\/18200.htm\"><span class='nobr'>a\nsomewhat<\/span> nutty, over-exuberant review<\/a> of this lens. <span class='nobr'>I saw somewhere<\/span>\nsomeone saying something along the lines of &#8220;when <span class='nobr'>I read<\/span> Ken's review\nof the D200 <span class='nobr'>I thought<\/span> he was <span class='nobr'>a bit<\/span> nuts, and when <span class='nobr'>I read<\/span> his review of the\nnew lens, <span class='nobr'>I thought<\/span> he was <i>really<\/i> nuts, but having now seen the\ncamera\/lens for myself, <span class='nobr'>I realize<\/span> that he's right&#8221;). <span class='nobr'>If you read<\/span>\naround forums and such, you'll find that <span class='nobr'>a lot<\/span> of people think Ken's <span class='nobr'>a bit<\/span>\nof character. <span class='nobr'>I don't<\/span> have an opinion one way or the other, but the\nexuberance he's able to communicate in his review makes for <span class='nobr'>a very<\/span> fun\nread.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\nAnyway, I've basically decided on the D200 with the new lens. <span class='nobr'>I went to<\/span> <span class='nobr'>a\nstore<\/span> yesterday to see the camera, and placed <span class='nobr'>a non<\/span>-binding order for one.\nThey're quite popular and on back order, and the store has no idea how long\nit might take (two days or two months; no idea). <span class='nobr'>If I get<\/span> time, I'll write\nabout the trip to the store and my first impressions of the actual camera,\nas that's <span class='nobr'>a story<\/span> in itself.\n\n<\/p><p>\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> So, as per my previous post, I'm considering a big full-function SLR to augment my micro-sized point-n-shoot Canon SD500. In the last day or so, my feeling has gone from \"considering\" to \"will buy\" to \"have ordered\". <\/p><p> To some extent, the decision about what to get is easier with an SLR than with a point-n-shoot; with the latter, the choice for me involves balancing three things (cost, features, size), while with an SLR it's just two (cost and features). Of course, with an SLR there are many, many more features. I don't have a lot of \"boy toys\" [...]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regex.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}