<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeffrey&#8217;s Autofocus Test Chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAKamal</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-46195</link>
		<dc:creator>MAKamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-46195</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey, thank you for providing this chart. I used the chart to test with my D700 and three of my lenses, Nikon 24-70mm 2.8, Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 and Sigma 85mm 1.4. Well I got the results but I don&#039;t know how to read or interpret the numbers on the chart. What I mean is how do I know what value to be set on the camera in AF Fine Tune? Or should I just use any value + or - and experiment? What is the relation between the numbers on the chart and the values in the camera? I know from the results that the camera is back focusing or front focusing, but I don&#039;t know how to translate the reading from the result to the camera AF Fine Tune values. Thank you.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;There&#039;s no relation between the numbers on the chart and in the camera... the chart numbers are just to have some text that&#039;s easy to compare in front and behind the plane of focus. To adjust camera fine tuning, experiment. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey, thank you for providing this chart. I used the chart to test with my D700 and three of my lenses, Nikon 24-70mm 2.8, Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 and Sigma 85mm 1.4. Well I got the results but I don&#8217;t know how to read or interpret the numbers on the chart. What I mean is how do I know what value to be set on the camera in AF Fine Tune? Or should I just use any value + or &#8211; and experiment? What is the relation between the numbers on the chart and the values in the camera? I know from the results that the camera is back focusing or front focusing, but I don&#8217;t know how to translate the reading from the result to the camera AF Fine Tune values. Thank you.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>There&#8217;s no relation between the numbers on the chart and in the camera&#8230; the chart numbers are just to have some text that&#8217;s easy to compare in front and behind the plane of focus. To adjust camera fine tuning, experiment. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-46100</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-46100</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey, Thanks for sharing -- your work here is truly paying it forward especially for amatures like me. I adjusted my sigma 150-500 -5 and can&#039;t wait to get back to the eagles nest and verify the results at some distance versus my grandsons action shots pitching and hitting at the ballpark. I am in Southwest Washington enjoying shooting wildlife, waterfalls, sunsets and a bit of everything else. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey, Thanks for sharing &#8212; your work here is truly paying it forward especially for amatures like me. I adjusted my sigma 150-500 -5 and can&#8217;t wait to get back to the eagles nest and verify the results at some distance versus my grandsons action shots pitching and hitting at the ballpark. I am in Southwest Washington enjoying shooting wildlife, waterfalls, sunsets and a bit of everything else. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-46003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-46003</guid>
		<description>Nice job on this chart and thanks for making it available. I just used it to dial in a new lens. Thankfully, it only needed -1! Hey, I converted them to PDF for easy printing. Let me know if you want copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job on this chart and thanks for making it available. I just used it to dial in a new lens. Thankfully, it only needed -1! Hey, I converted them to PDF for easy printing. Let me know if you want copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45891</link>
		<dc:creator>André</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45891</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for your work. I´ve been struggling with my 7D autofocus for while, and was considering buying the LensAlign System, but your chart really did the job. It´s not an simple task, and took me some time to finally get there, but everything is sharp now. So sharp!

From Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, thank you again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your work. I´ve been struggling with my 7D autofocus for while, and was considering buying the LensAlign System, but your chart really did the job. It´s not an simple task, and took me some time to finally get there, but everything is sharp now. So sharp!</p>
<p>From Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, thank you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kosiur</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45853</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kosiur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45853</guid>
		<description>Jeff -

I wonder if I&#039;m doing something wrong with the charts? I&#039;ve tried prints of the 25%, 15%, and 5% charts with my D7000 using the 24-70mm 2.8G lens and it always focuses on the gray areas! Haven&#039;t been able to print an test file that confuses the D700 autofocus so I can get on with the rest of the test procedure.

I&#039;m printing on a satin paper -- would that make a difference?

Thanks

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The paper could make a difference, as could your printer, but it&#039;s also possible that the D7000&#039;s autofocus sensor is much more sensitive? &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff -</p>
<p>I wonder if I&#8217;m doing something wrong with the charts? I&#8217;ve tried prints of the 25%, 15%, and 5% charts with my D7000 using the 24-70mm 2.8G lens and it always focuses on the gray areas! Haven&#8217;t been able to print an test file that confuses the D700 autofocus so I can get on with the rest of the test procedure.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m printing on a satin paper &#8212; would that make a difference?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The paper could make a difference, as could your printer, but it&#8217;s also possible that the D7000&#8242;s autofocus sensor is much more sensitive? &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45795</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45795</guid>
		<description>You sir, are a genius. I&#039;m very glad with this focus chart, as it is easy to self-produce and very understandable. Thank you for sharing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sir, are a genius. I&#8217;m very glad with this focus chart, as it is easy to self-produce and very understandable. Thank you for sharing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnG</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45689</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45689</guid>
		<description>Hi from AZ.  As a D80 is my first SLR, and I&#039;ve finally caught the bug, I&#039;ve been catching up these last few weeks. The learning curve is indeed steep.  I LOVE your chart. Makes so much more sense than anything else I&#039;ve seen and it tells me EXACTLY what my camera / lens is doing.  OK I have some questions that have popped up using your chart EXACTLY to instructions. I have a Tamron 28-80 3.5-5.6 lens... the only AF one I have for now. All the test shots reveal back focus, which confirms what I&#039;ve found in my other experiments.  Technically speaking as far as I understand it,  autofocus uses the image coming through the lens itself to get the right setting. Isn&#039;t the auto focus sensor in the camera? To me, it wouldn&#039;t matter how far off the lens is, as long as the camera can turn the rings until it gets the sharpest image on the focus sensor. So why would one lens lean to back focus and another to front focus unless the autofocus sensor is actually in the lens? In my thinking, perfect calibration would be  obtained if the distance from the lens to the CCD sensor equaled exactly the distance from the lens to the focusing sensor. 

Another question I have is a few other posters have eluded to &quot;dialing in&quot; focus offsets in the programming in order to compensate for the back or front focusing issue in various lenses. Is that a setting possible in my D80? Is there a software focus offset in a hidden menu somewhere? Perhaps is there an adjustment screw to reposition the focus sensor? My apologies for a long post.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;It seems that the D80 does not have per-lens calibration, but there is a set screw in the mirror box: &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.howtoshot.com/82/how-to-fix-front-focus-nikon-d90-d80-back-focus-problem/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;. I never thought much about why lenses might require lens-specific adjustments... I just figured focusing is a complex chain of events with many variables, some of which depend on the specifics of each unit. Now that you ask, I find myself wondering as well...&#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi from AZ.  As a D80 is my first SLR, and I&#8217;ve finally caught the bug, I&#8217;ve been catching up these last few weeks. The learning curve is indeed steep.  I LOVE your chart. Makes so much more sense than anything else I&#8217;ve seen and it tells me EXACTLY what my camera / lens is doing.  OK I have some questions that have popped up using your chart EXACTLY to instructions. I have a Tamron 28-80 3.5-5.6 lens&#8230; the only AF one I have for now. All the test shots reveal back focus, which confirms what I&#8217;ve found in my other experiments.  Technically speaking as far as I understand it,  autofocus uses the image coming through the lens itself to get the right setting. Isn&#8217;t the auto focus sensor in the camera? To me, it wouldn&#8217;t matter how far off the lens is, as long as the camera can turn the rings until it gets the sharpest image on the focus sensor. So why would one lens lean to back focus and another to front focus unless the autofocus sensor is actually in the lens? In my thinking, perfect calibration would be  obtained if the distance from the lens to the CCD sensor equaled exactly the distance from the lens to the focusing sensor. </p>
<p>Another question I have is a few other posters have eluded to &#8220;dialing in&#8221; focus offsets in the programming in order to compensate for the back or front focusing issue in various lenses. Is that a setting possible in my D80? Is there a software focus offset in a hidden menu somewhere? Perhaps is there an adjustment screw to reposition the focus sensor? My apologies for a long post.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>It seems that the D80 does not have per-lens calibration, but there is a set screw in the mirror box: <a href='http://www.howtoshot.com/82/how-to-fix-front-focus-nikon-d90-d80-back-focus-problem/' rel="nofollow">see here</a>. I never thought much about why lenses might require lens-specific adjustments&#8230; I just figured focusing is a complex chain of events with many variables, some of which depend on the specifics of each unit. Now that you ask, I find myself wondering as well&#8230;&mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchel</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45525</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45525</guid>
		<description>great help on the chart thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great help on the chart thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pierce</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45439</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45439</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey,

I&#039;m sure my comments are no different than the dozens already stated here ... your charts absolutely makes the difference between frustrating, inconsistent results and a properly adjusted lens/body combination. Your design is simple, clever and very effective.
I had tried several of the &quot;other&quot; lens charts and had become very frustrated with my lens collection. After using your charts (and following your clear instructions) I&#039;m now a happy camper.

Thanks for all that you do,
It does make a difference for those of us that work hard to earn the gear we have.

My very best,

dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure my comments are no different than the dozens already stated here &#8230; your charts absolutely makes the difference between frustrating, inconsistent results and a properly adjusted lens/body combination. Your design is simple, clever and very effective.<br />
I had tried several of the &#8220;other&#8221; lens charts and had become very frustrated with my lens collection. After using your charts (and following your clear instructions) I&#8217;m now a happy camper.</p>
<p>Thanks for all that you do,<br />
It does make a difference for those of us that work hard to earn the gear we have.</p>
<p>My very best,</p>
<p>dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecosse5</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart#comment-45382</link>
		<dc:creator>ecosse5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/photo-tech/focus-chart/#comment-45382</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey,

Just for the record I live in Scotland. I first used your excellent charts in 2009 when I had my D70s and D200 and I was very impressed with all the helpful info on your website then. I am back again as I need the help of your charts. I now have a D300 &amp; a D700. Lenses include Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 VR1 &amp; Sigma 28-70 f2.8 EX IF DG HSM. Recently the Sigma developed a focusing fault and it went back to Sigma. It has been returned and the focusing fault [it would not stop hunting] has been rectified. I wanted to check the focus accuracy of the Sigma on both bodies.

After much adjustment using the &quot;AF Fine Tune&quot; feature on both bodies I find this lens does not need any adjustment on the D300 whereas it needs -15 or even -20 on the D700! I am quite confused, more than a little disappointed, and would greatly appreciate your comments and advice.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Reg Gray.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t have a lot of insight into the AF Fine Tune feature on cameras, but I would expect that they are relative to an average setting for the specific body. I can imagine that the same lens on several D700s could result in different fine-tune settings, because it&#039;s not an absolute statement about the lens, but rather, about the lens/body combination. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey,</p>
<p>Just for the record I live in Scotland. I first used your excellent charts in 2009 when I had my D70s and D200 and I was very impressed with all the helpful info on your website then. I am back again as I need the help of your charts. I now have a D300 &amp; a D700. Lenses include Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 VR1 &amp; Sigma 28-70 f2.8 EX IF DG HSM. Recently the Sigma developed a focusing fault and it went back to Sigma. It has been returned and the focusing fault [it would not stop hunting] has been rectified. I wanted to check the focus accuracy of the Sigma on both bodies.</p>
<p>After much adjustment using the &#8220;AF Fine Tune&#8221; feature on both bodies I find this lens does not need any adjustment on the D300 whereas it needs -15 or even -20 on the D700! I am quite confused, more than a little disappointed, and would greatly appreciate your comments and advice.</p>
<p>Look forward to hearing from you.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Reg Gray.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t have a lot of insight into the AF Fine Tune feature on cameras, but I would expect that they are relative to an average setting for the specific body. I can imagine that the same lens on several D700s could result in different fine-tune settings, because it&#8217;s not an absolute statement about the lens, but rather, about the lens/body combination. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

