<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeffrey&#8217;s &#8220;Metadata Wrangler&#8221; Lightroom Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-43668</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-43668</guid>
		<description>Need a little help.  I downloaded the lightroom plug-in.  imac.  lightroom 3
Plug-in manager says it is there and running.
I can&#039;t find it after that.  Doesn&#039;t show up on llist of publishing services.
Can you lend me a hand and help me get this figured out.  I want to publish directly from Lightroom to my zenfolio acct.

Thanks!

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The Metadata Wrangler is a filter for any export, but not an export provider itself. For Zenfolio, you&#039;ll want &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/zenfolio/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Zenfolio plugin&lt;/a&gt;. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need a little help.  I downloaded the lightroom plug-in.  imac.  lightroom 3<br />
Plug-in manager says it is there and running.<br />
I can&#8217;t find it after that.  Doesn&#8217;t show up on llist of publishing services.<br />
Can you lend me a hand and help me get this figured out.  I want to publish directly from Lightroom to my zenfolio acct.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The Metadata Wrangler is a filter for any export, but not an export provider itself. For Zenfolio, you&#8217;ll want <a href='http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/zenfolio/' rel="nofollow">the Zenfolio plugin</a>. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier Riom</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-43508</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier Riom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-43508</guid>
		<description>Hello Jeff,

As a new user of your Metadata Wrangler plugin for LR2.7, I was wondering if it would be possible to have a kind of &quot;manager&quot; which would allow to strip keywords families using hierarchy?
I may be willing to remove some keywords families in the exported pictures regarding for instance : Continental geolocalisation or atmosphere.
Thank you.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Your better bet would be to simply mark some keywords to not be exported. You can also use the Wrangler&#039;s filtering based upon prefixes or suffixes you use with your keywords. You can also use my &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/run-any-command&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;run-any-command plugin&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;exiftool&lt;/a&gt; to perform complex custom processing. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jeff,</p>
<p>As a new user of your Metadata Wrangler plugin for LR2.7, I was wondering if it would be possible to have a kind of &#8220;manager&#8221; which would allow to strip keywords families using hierarchy?<br />
I may be willing to remove some keywords families in the exported pictures regarding for instance : Continental geolocalisation or atmosphere.<br />
Thank you.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Your better bet would be to simply mark some keywords to not be exported. You can also use the Wrangler&#8217;s filtering based upon prefixes or suffixes you use with your keywords. You can also use my <a href='http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/run-any-command' rel="nofollow">run-any-command plugin</a> with <a href='http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/' rel="nofollow">exiftool</a> to perform complex custom processing. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sirota</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-43454</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sirota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-43454</guid>
		<description>People have, in the past, asked for the ability to strip the camera serial number.  As of EXIF 2.3 this is now a standardized field, and as of LR3.4 it is exported.  I would like to renew the request to be able to explicitly strip this.  Thanks!

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I must have missed it the first time, &#039;cause I hadn&#039;t been aware of the Exif changes. Thanks for the heads up. I just pushed &lt;b&gt;.73&lt;/b&gt;, which now handles serial number, and more. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have, in the past, asked for the ability to strip the camera serial number.  As of EXIF 2.3 this is now a standardized field, and as of LR3.4 it is exported.  I would like to renew the request to be able to explicitly strip this.  Thanks!</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I must have missed it the first time, &#8217;cause I hadn&#8217;t been aware of the Exif changes. Thanks for the heads up. I just pushed <b>.73</b>, which now handles serial number, and more. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuxyso</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-43067</link>
		<dc:creator>tuxyso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-43067</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with metadatawrangler-20110419.71. I use LR 3.4 (German version), Windows 7 Ultimate. The export plugins does not work and returns the following errors:

**** Error 1

Beim Ausführen eines Skripts des Zusatzmoduls ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. (There was an error while executing the script of the plugin) 
BASE:53: attempt to call field &#039;?&#039; (a nil value)

Any ideas?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I&#039;ve seen this a few times, and it always seems to clear up if you restart Lightroom and/or reload the plugin a few times. I&#039;ve never understood why. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with metadatawrangler-20110419.71. I use LR 3.4 (German version), Windows 7 Ultimate. The export plugins does not work and returns the following errors:</p>
<p>**** Error 1</p>
<p>Beim Ausführen eines Skripts des Zusatzmoduls ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. (There was an error while executing the script of the plugin)<br />
BASE:53: attempt to call field &#8216;?&#8217; (a nil value)</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I&#8217;ve seen this a few times, and it always seems to clear up if you restart Lightroom and/or reload the plugin a few times. I&#8217;ve never understood why. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-42713</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-42713</guid>
		<description>When I update the plugin in Lightroom Plugin Manager  I get two copies of the plugin : the last version and a copy of the previous one with a different name. I guess this copy is a backup and I have to delete it manually otherwise Lightroom loads both.  As Time Machine creates backups on a hourly basis the copy is useless.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Ah, I see. The upgrade process leaves the old plugin around with a unique name, so that&#039;s what you&#039;re seeing. I didn&#039;t think about the situation when you have the plugins in the Lr system location (since Lr was not designed to have 3rd-party plugins there), but I&#039;ll see whether I can&#039;t do something to mitigate the problem.... &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I update the plugin in Lightroom Plugin Manager  I get two copies of the plugin : the last version and a copy of the previous one with a different name. I guess this copy is a backup and I have to delete it manually otherwise Lightroom loads both.  As Time Machine creates backups on a hourly basis the copy is useless.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Ah, I see. The upgrade process leaves the old plugin around with a unique name, so that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re seeing. I didn&#8217;t think about the situation when you have the plugins in the Lr system location (since Lr was not designed to have 3rd-party plugins there), but I&#8217;ll see whether I can&#8217;t do something to mitigate the problem&#8230;. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-42711</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-42711</guid>
		<description>Time Machine is a backup feature included in Mac OS since 10.5.
I do use Plugin Manager, do you suggest I have to move all my plugins in a new place to get rid of that useless backup copy?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I use Time Machine myself, but I don&#039;t understand the reference to it (and to backup copies) in the context of plugins. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Machine is a backup feature included in Mac OS since 10.5.<br />
I do use Plugin Manager, do you suggest I have to move all my plugins in a new place to get rid of that useless backup copy?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I use Time Machine myself, but I don&#8217;t understand the reference to it (and to backup copies) in the context of plugins. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-42709</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-42709</guid>
		<description>Each time I update one of yout plugins I have to go to ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Lightroom/Modules to get rid of a copy of the old one. On MacOS iy&#039;s a waste of time, we have Time Machine in case something goes wrong with the last version [this never occurs in fact ;-)]

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t understand the reference to Time Machine, but you probably shouldn&#039;t be putting non-Adobe plugins into  that folder... that&#039;s where they &lt;i&gt;had&lt;/i&gt; to go in Lr1, but Lr2 introduced the Plugin Manager. You can add and remove plugins with the Plugin Manager &lt;i&gt;unless&lt;/i&gt; they are in that folder.  You might want to make a ~/Library/LightroomPlugins/ folder, or the like, to store third-party plugins.... &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each time I update one of yout plugins I have to go to ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Lightroom/Modules to get rid of a copy of the old one. On MacOS iy&#8217;s a waste of time, we have Time Machine in case something goes wrong with the last version [this never occurs in fact <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ]</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t understand the reference to Time Machine, but you probably shouldn&#8217;t be putting non-Adobe plugins into  that folder&#8230; that&#8217;s where they <i>had</i> to go in Lr1, but Lr2 introduced the Plugin Manager. You can add and remove plugins with the Plugin Manager <i>unless</i> they are in that folder.  You might want to make a ~/Library/LightroomPlugins/ folder, or the like, to store third-party plugins&#8230;. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campo</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-42357</link>
		<dc:creator>Campo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-42357</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey, from Holland.

It seems this is not really a bug but took me a while to figure out.  I am using the Wrangler when uploading to SmugMug.  I have defined a preset to strip almost everything, including the &quot;Entire IPTC block&quot;.  No problem so far, really.  I can type the description of each picture in the Caption field, and SmugMug will display it as expected.  However, as soon as I tried entering accented or international characters, they ended up being translated into the non-accented version.  For example, é is shown as e, ø is shown as o.  After some digging this turns out to be caused by the stripping of the IPTC block.  What&#039;s misleading is that a copy of the Caption field is included in the Exif block, with the accents removed.

Lesson learned: if you care about accented characters / diacritics in Captions, don&#039;t strip the IPTC block.

This is with LR 3.3 and Wrangler 20110203.69.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Yes, if you strip IPTC, you&#039;re left only with Exif, and Exif is explicitly 7-bit ASCII (Why? Because the folks that designed the standard were not very smart.) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey, from Holland.</p>
<p>It seems this is not really a bug but took me a while to figure out.  I am using the Wrangler when uploading to SmugMug.  I have defined a preset to strip almost everything, including the &#8220;Entire IPTC block&#8221;.  No problem so far, really.  I can type the description of each picture in the Caption field, and SmugMug will display it as expected.  However, as soon as I tried entering accented or international characters, they ended up being translated into the non-accented version.  For example, é is shown as e, ø is shown as o.  After some digging this turns out to be caused by the stripping of the IPTC block.  What&#8217;s misleading is that a copy of the Caption field is included in the Exif block, with the accents removed.</p>
<p>Lesson learned: if you care about accented characters / diacritics in Captions, don&#8217;t strip the IPTC block.</p>
<p>This is with LR 3.3 and Wrangler 20110203.69.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Yes, if you strip IPTC, you&#8217;re left only with Exif, and Exif is explicitly 7-bit ASCII (Why? Because the folks that designed the standard were not very smart.) &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-41909</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-41909</guid>
		<description>from australia,

let say i have a camera that takes pictures on a 3000x5000 pixel sensor. if i crop the image in lightroom, the displayed size is adjusted to something like 2890x4900 for instance.

now i want to upload a copy of this image to a stock library but they require pics with a longest side of 500 pixels. i can do that on the export from lightroom. with your plugin i can remove all metadata that i don&#039;t feel necessary. i can leave the size info and it reads 295x500. is it possible to keep also the cropped size calculated by lightroom (2890x4900) so that the library knows the original file size. 

thank you.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I&#039;m not sure what you mean by &quot;the library&quot;, but I suppose you could use &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/run-any-command/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my run-any-command filter&lt;/a&gt; to try to get &lt;a href=&#039;http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ExifTool&lt;/a&gt; to insert the OriginalWidth and OriginalHeight (via &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/template&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;template tokens&lt;/a&gt;) to some metadata field or other. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from australia,</p>
<p>let say i have a camera that takes pictures on a 3000&#215;5000 pixel sensor. if i crop the image in lightroom, the displayed size is adjusted to something like 2890&#215;4900 for instance.</p>
<p>now i want to upload a copy of this image to a stock library but they require pics with a longest side of 500 pixels. i can do that on the export from lightroom. with your plugin i can remove all metadata that i don&#8217;t feel necessary. i can leave the size info and it reads 295&#215;500. is it possible to keep also the cropped size calculated by lightroom (2890&#215;4900) so that the library knows the original file size. </p>
<p>thank you.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by &#8220;the library&#8221;, but I suppose you could use <a href='http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/run-any-command/' rel="nofollow">my run-any-command filter</a> to try to get <a href='http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/' rel="nofollow">ExifTool</a> to insert the OriginalWidth and OriginalHeight (via <a href='http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/template' rel="nofollow">template tokens</a>) to some metadata field or other. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler#comment-41611</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-wrangler/#comment-41611</guid>
		<description>From the UK, running LR 3.3 and Metadata Wrangler 20100829.68

Is there a way to not strip the email address from the contact metadata held within the IPTC section in LR?

Thanks.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;If leaving the whole IPTC section is more than you want to do, you might want to strip it with the wrangler, then add it back via ExifTool and my run-any-command plugin. Or, you might consider stuffing the email into one of the Exif fields, which the plugin gives more granular access. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the UK, running LR 3.3 and Metadata Wrangler 20100829.68</p>
<p>Is there a way to not strip the email address from the contact metadata held within the IPTC section in LR?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>If leaving the whole IPTC section is more than you want to do, you might want to strip it with the wrangler, then add it back via ExifTool and my run-any-command plugin. Or, you might consider stuffing the email into one of the Exif fields, which the plugin gives more granular access. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

