<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeffrey&#8217;s &#8220;Megapixel Sort&#8221; Lightroom Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Young</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-44964</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-44964</guid>
		<description>I tried this plugin, and it does what it claims, but I find myself needing different &quot;megapixel buckets&quot; than it gives me.

While you could solve this by allowing the user to enter custom ranges, I think it would be better if the plugin could calculate optimum buckets by itself based on the population of photos in my particular library. For algorithm inspiration, I suggest looking into Heckbert color quantization. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_quantization)  Instead of subdividing 3D color space, you&#039;d be subdividing 1D megapixel space.

So you understand where I am coming from, my immediate need here is that I have a bunch of old photos in my library, scattered all over, and I want to start deleting or downrating ones that have too few megapixels by today&#039;s standards. The &lt; 0.1 MP bucket is minimally useful to me because I have very few photos that were &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; bad. The next bucket up (0.1-0.5 MP) catches too many photos I want to keep. I suspect I&#039;d be most interested in removing things in the 0.2-0.3 MP range.

I think if you did a Heckbert-like automatic clump finder on the population of megapixel values in my library, you&#039;d automatically generate a bucket in the right sort of range for my needs. It might be necessary to allow a custom number of buckets, to get enough resolution.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The problem is that Lightroom doesn&#039;t allow any of this to be dynamic, so the best I can do is come up with something that seems useful to the most folks. It would be much better for Lightroom to deal with this as a first-class bit of metadata, so the plugin wasn&#039;t needed at all. )-: &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this plugin, and it does what it claims, but I find myself needing different &#8220;megapixel buckets&#8221; than it gives me.</p>
<p>While you could solve this by allowing the user to enter custom ranges, I think it would be better if the plugin could calculate optimum buckets by itself based on the population of photos in my particular library. For algorithm inspiration, I suggest looking into Heckbert color quantization. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_quantization" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_quantization</a>)  Instead of subdividing 3D color space, you&#8217;d be subdividing 1D megapixel space.</p>
<p>So you understand where I am coming from, my immediate need here is that I have a bunch of old photos in my library, scattered all over, and I want to start deleting or downrating ones that have too few megapixels by today&#8217;s standards. The &lt; 0.1 MP bucket is minimally useful to me because I have very few photos that were <i>that</i> bad. The next bucket up (0.1-0.5 MP) catches too many photos I want to keep. I suspect I&#8217;d be most interested in removing things in the 0.2-0.3 MP range.</p>
<p>I think if you did a Heckbert-like automatic clump finder on the population of megapixel values in my library, you&#8217;d automatically generate a bucket in the right sort of range for my needs. It might be necessary to allow a custom number of buckets, to get enough resolution.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The problem is that Lightroom doesn&#8217;t allow any of this to be dynamic, so the best I can do is come up with something that seems useful to the most folks. It would be much better for Lightroom to deal with this as a first-class bit of metadata, so the plugin wasn&#8217;t needed at all. )-: &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-44844</link>
		<dc:creator>David W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-44844</guid>
		<description>I was shocked to discover Lightroom doesn&#039;t ship with this functionality built-in. Thank you so much for your work on this. The plugin works great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked to discover Lightroom doesn&#8217;t ship with this functionality built-in. Thank you so much for your work on this. The plugin works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-43845</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-43845</guid>
		<description>Interesting plugin. I&#039;m trying t find a way to sort by file size.

Essentially, I want to create a smart collection that  shows me excessively large files (TIF and PSD) that are over a year old. My thought is that at that point, some/many/most of them can be flattened and I can reclaim hard drive real-estate. But I&#039;m stymied by the lack of file size sort. Any suggestions?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The best I can suggest is to use the Library Grid Filter to isolate images that have not been edited in a while, then among those, use &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/extended-search&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my Extended-Search plugin&lt;/a&gt; to isolate ones that have a large file size. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting plugin. I&#8217;m trying t find a way to sort by file size.</p>
<p>Essentially, I want to create a smart collection that  shows me excessively large files (TIF and PSD) that are over a year old. My thought is that at that point, some/many/most of them can be flattened and I can reclaim hard drive real-estate. But I&#8217;m stymied by the lack of file size sort. Any suggestions?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The best I can suggest is to use the Library Grid Filter to isolate images that have not been edited in a while, then among those, use <a href='http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/extended-search' rel="nofollow">my Extended-Search plugin</a> to isolate ones that have a large file size. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Haynes</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-37013</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-37013</guid>
		<description>I need to be able to determine the UNCOMPRESSED size of a JPEG file. 

My stock agency requires the JPEG, when opened in Photoshop or any other application, to be at least 48MB in file size. Is it possible to make a plugin that would calculate this? 

For example, one of my JPEG files is caclulated by your plugin to be 12.1 Megapixels. The JPEG is 7.6MB. Opened in Photoshop, it&#039;s 34.4MB.

The only two image editing programs that I know to give me this data are ACDSee Pro 3 and Photoshop. Sure would be nice to see it in Lightroom.

Alan

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t see how you&#039;re getting 34.4MB from 12.1 MP (2.8 bytes/pixel?), but you can upsize on export to meet arbitrary size requirements. Tim Armes&#039; &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.photographers-toolbox.com/products/lr2mogrify.php&#039; class=&#039;quiet&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LR2/Mogrify plugin&lt;/a&gt; has some options to do this automatically. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to be able to determine the UNCOMPRESSED size of a JPEG file. </p>
<p>My stock agency requires the JPEG, when opened in Photoshop or any other application, to be at least 48MB in file size. Is it possible to make a plugin that would calculate this? </p>
<p>For example, one of my JPEG files is caclulated by your plugin to be 12.1 Megapixels. The JPEG is 7.6MB. Opened in Photoshop, it&#8217;s 34.4MB.</p>
<p>The only two image editing programs that I know to give me this data are ACDSee Pro 3 and Photoshop. Sure would be nice to see it in Lightroom.</p>
<p>Alan</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t see how you&#8217;re getting 34.4MB from 12.1 MP (2.8 bytes/pixel?), but you can upsize on export to meet arbitrary size requirements. Tim Armes&#8217; <a href='http://www.photographers-toolbox.com/products/lr2mogrify.php' class='quiet' rel="nofollow">LR2/Mogrify plugin</a> has some options to do this automatically. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-36911</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-36911</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for the answer. It works fine. I don&#039;t understand why it is not on the SDK documentation. Is there any additional source of information?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;There&#039;s a Lightroom SDK forum over at Adobe as well. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the answer. It works fine. I don&#8217;t understand why it is not on the SDK documentation. Is there any additional source of information?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>There&#8217;s a Lightroom SDK forum over at Adobe as well. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-36894</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-36894</guid>
		<description>I can`t find how to get the cropped dimensions in lightroom SDK API. How did you managed?

Thank you

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;&lt;tt&gt;local size = photo:getRawMetadata(&#039;croppedDimensions&#039;)&lt;/tt&gt; &#160;&#160;&#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can`t find how to get the cropped dimensions in lightroom SDK API. How did you managed?</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'><tt>local size = photo:getRawMetadata('croppedDimensions')</tt> &nbsp;&nbsp;&mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-36812</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-36812</guid>
		<description>Another vote for the Focal Length. Having just got a Leica M8  I really want to be able to filter based on the lens I used.  

regards from the Stockholm archipelago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote for the Focal Length. Having just got a Leica M8  I really want to be able to filter based on the lens I used.  </p>
<p>regards from the Stockholm archipelago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-36106</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-36106</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree focal length filter/sorter would be a very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree focal length filter/sorter would be a very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Dierckxsens</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-35752</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Dierckxsens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-35752</guid>
		<description>As Ollivier Robert suggested, it would really be usefull to allow sorting by focal length.    It would then be possible to create Smart collections with different groups of focal lenghts. like 40mm, ... or even tele, wide, ...

The problem is that compact camera&#039;s tend to record the compact focal length, so a 7mm would be in reality a 28mm for a 35mm camera.  The 35mm equivalent should be then calculated one way or another.  I believe there is an exif attribute holding the 35mm equivalent but I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Ollivier Robert suggested, it would really be usefull to allow sorting by focal length.    It would then be possible to create Smart collections with different groups of focal lenghts. like 40mm, &#8230; or even tele, wide, &#8230;</p>
<p>The problem is that compact camera&#8217;s tend to record the compact focal length, so a 7mm would be in reality a 28mm for a 35mm camera.  The 35mm equivalent should be then calculated one way or another.  I believe there is an exif attribute holding the 35mm equivalent but I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollivier Robert</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort#comment-35700</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollivier Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/megapixel-sort/#comment-35700</guid>
		<description>Hello, interesting plugin, do you think one that allow sorting by focal length would be possible as well?  I find that lack in LR annoying (I even mentioned it on the Adobe forum...).

Cheers and thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, interesting plugin, do you think one that allow sorting by focal length would be possible as well?  I find that lack in LR annoying (I even mentioned it on the Adobe forum&#8230;).</p>
<p>Cheers and thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

