<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeffrey&#8217;s &#8220;Export to KODAK Gallery&#8221; Lightroom Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed W.</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-46164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 16:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-46164</guid>
		<description>Yes, Kodak sold there online printing business to Shutterfly.com. There is an announcement on the Kodak website.  They mention how all photos will be moved over to shutterfly and no more orders will be accepted from kodak past July 2nd 2012.
Kodak Galaery managers statement found here;
http://www.kodakgallery.com/gallery/lp/shutterfly/index.jsp

The Lightroom plug in for Shutterfly you mention is this one I believe, http://www.don-mckee.com/lightoom/ ,  it says its for LR 2 and it also looks like it hasn&#039;t been updated for some time, abandoned maybe?
This is why I had humbly asked if you would take up the torch for a Shutterfly plugin, I know you tend to your plug ins and are amazing given this is a hobby for you, in updating and/or fixing the plug ins you create.

Thank you again for putting up with us LR p.i.a&#039;s asking you to eat up your time creating and maintaining LR plugins for us.  It is greatly appreciated.

Ed Walsh
Queens, NYC, USA

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The author of that plugin commented &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&amp;extid=1797027&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; that it still works in Lr4. Perhaps give it a try... &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Kodak sold there online printing business to Shutterfly.com. There is an announcement on the Kodak website.  They mention how all photos will be moved over to shutterfly and no more orders will be accepted from kodak past July 2nd 2012.<br />
Kodak Galaery managers statement found here;<br />
<a href="http://www.kodakgallery.com/gallery/lp/shutterfly/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.kodakgallery.com/gallery/lp/shutterfly/index.jsp</a></p>
<p>The Lightroom plug in for Shutterfly you mention is this one I believe, <a href="http://www.don-mckee.com/lightoom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.don-mckee.com/lightoom/</a> ,  it says its for LR 2 and it also looks like it hasn&#8217;t been updated for some time, abandoned maybe?<br />
This is why I had humbly asked if you would take up the torch for a Shutterfly plugin, I know you tend to your plug ins and are amazing given this is a hobby for you, in updating and/or fixing the plug ins you create.</p>
<p>Thank you again for putting up with us LR p.i.a&#8217;s asking you to eat up your time creating and maintaining LR plugins for us.  It is greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Ed Walsh<br />
Queens, NYC, USA</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The author of that plugin commented <a href='http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&#038;extid=1797027' rel="nofollow">here</a> that it still works in Lr4. Perhaps give it a try&#8230; &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed W.</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-46160</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 03:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-46160</guid>
		<description>Now that Kodak Gallery has announced it&#039;s shutting down and moving all photos to shutterfly.com by July 2nd 2012, any chance you will make a Shutterfly Export plug-in for Lightroom?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I hadn&#039;t heard about Kodak Gallery shutting down, but I believe there&#039;s already a Shutterfly plugin listed at Adobe&#039;s &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.adobe.com/go/lightroom_exchange&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lightroom Exchange&lt;/a&gt;. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Kodak Gallery has announced it&#8217;s shutting down and moving all photos to shutterfly.com by July 2nd 2012, any chance you will make a Shutterfly Export plug-in for Lightroom?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I hadn&#8217;t heard about Kodak Gallery shutting down, but I believe there&#8217;s already a Shutterfly plugin listed at Adobe&#8217;s <a href='http://www.adobe.com/go/lightroom_exchange' rel="nofollow">Lightroom Exchange</a>. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-44933</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-44933</guid>
		<description>Jeff,  I&#039;m using the Kodak Export Plugin to update and maintain multiple Kodak Gallery Albums for various family members on both sides of the family, all from a single Kodak Gallery login.  This means sometimes I export/upload the same picture to multiple Kodak Gallery Albums.  Does the plugin remember which Kodak Gallery Album I&#039;ve updated it to, or only that it was uploaded to &#039;a&#039; Kodak Gallery Album?  It seems that the &quot;Update&quot; &amp; &quot;New&quot; selection features don&#039;t know which albums the pictures have or have not been updated to.   Can you shed some light on this?

Great plugin, BTW.  I really like managing the Kodak Galleries from within Lightroom.  Just wanted to see if it&#039;s a bug or working as built, and if this is the expected behavior, if I could ask that this be put on an enhancement list for sometime in the future.

Thanks

Massachusetts, USA

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;For the purposes of &quot;Updated&quot; vs. &quot;New&quot;, the plugin distinguishes only whether it&#039;s ever been uploaded, which in your case is inconvenient, sorry. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,  I&#8217;m using the Kodak Export Plugin to update and maintain multiple Kodak Gallery Albums for various family members on both sides of the family, all from a single Kodak Gallery login.  This means sometimes I export/upload the same picture to multiple Kodak Gallery Albums.  Does the plugin remember which Kodak Gallery Album I&#8217;ve updated it to, or only that it was uploaded to &#8216;a&#8217; Kodak Gallery Album?  It seems that the &#8220;Update&#8221; &amp; &#8220;New&#8221; selection features don&#8217;t know which albums the pictures have or have not been updated to.   Can you shed some light on this?</p>
<p>Great plugin, BTW.  I really like managing the Kodak Galleries from within Lightroom.  Just wanted to see if it&#8217;s a bug or working as built, and if this is the expected behavior, if I could ask that this be put on an enhancement list for sometime in the future.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Massachusetts, USA</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>For the purposes of &#8220;Updated&#8221; vs. &#8220;New&#8221;, the plugin distinguishes only whether it&#8217;s ever been uploaded, which in your case is inconvenient, sorry. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokkman</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-44657</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-44657</guid>
		<description>kodak-20110729.21.zip 
Wind 7, LR 3.5

Jeff, I installed the Kodak plugin, but it does not show up in the Publish Services.

Yellowstone, Montana

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;It&#039;s an Export plugin, not a Publish plugin. You&#039;ll find it in the &quot;File &gt; Export&quot; dialog. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kodak-20110729.21.zip<br />
Wind 7, LR 3.5</p>
<p>Jeff, I installed the Kodak plugin, but it does not show up in the Publish Services.</p>
<p>Yellowstone, Montana</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>It&#8217;s an Export plugin, not a Publish plugin. You&#8217;ll find it in the &#8220;File &gt; Export&#8221; dialog. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-43565</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-43565</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,

Thanks for sharing this plug-in. Unfortunately, my computer keeps giving me a message that Windows is unable to open the zip file because it&#039;s invalid. Any idea what&#039;s wrong? I&#039;m anxious to get my Lightroom 3 photos onto Kodak Gallery and can&#039;t think of another solution.  I&#039;m writing from Philadelphia. 

Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks,
Jenn

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Check out &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/faq#baddownload&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this FAQ&lt;/a&gt; &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this plug-in. Unfortunately, my computer keeps giving me a message that Windows is unable to open the zip file because it&#8217;s invalid. Any idea what&#8217;s wrong? I&#8217;m anxious to get my Lightroom 3 photos onto Kodak Gallery and can&#8217;t think of another solution.  I&#8217;m writing from Philadelphia. </p>
<p>Any help is much appreciated!<br />
Thanks,<br />
Jenn</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Check out <a href='http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/faq#baddownload' rel="nofollow">this FAQ</a> &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-42848</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-42848</guid>
		<description>For my new computer system, I am trying to decide between staying with Adobe Photoshop Elements and Photoshop Lightroom.  One feature of Elements that I like is that the upload brings with it the title embedded in the picture.  This is good because Kodak Gallery, when &quot;pulling&quot; the picture using its software, does not bring the embedded title with it.  If I switch to Lightroom, I would want to use your software IF it &quot;pushes&quot; the information in the title and/or subject field up to Kodak the same as Elements.  Does the software do this.  Thank you, Ken Gould

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Yes, it allows you to pick what metadata to send to Kodak as the caption.  Elements and Lightroom are intended to solve totally different problems, so one is likely much more suitable to your needs, whatever they are. Lightroom is useful for a photographer, Elements for someone needing to manipulate pixels on an image one at a time. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my new computer system, I am trying to decide between staying with Adobe Photoshop Elements and Photoshop Lightroom.  One feature of Elements that I like is that the upload brings with it the title embedded in the picture.  This is good because Kodak Gallery, when &#8220;pulling&#8221; the picture using its software, does not bring the embedded title with it.  If I switch to Lightroom, I would want to use your software IF it &#8220;pushes&#8221; the information in the title and/or subject field up to Kodak the same as Elements.  Does the software do this.  Thank you, Ken Gould</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Yes, it allows you to pick what metadata to send to Kodak as the caption.  Elements and Lightroom are intended to solve totally different problems, so one is likely much more suitable to your needs, whatever they are. Lightroom is useful for a photographer, Elements for someone needing to manipulate pixels on an image one at a time. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-41608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-41608</guid>
		<description>Hello--I am looking for some advice on how to solve a problem in lightroom. Somehow we have multiple copies of thousands of photos and removing the doubles is so time consuming--photos are already &quot;starred&quot; and categorized. Is there some way to remove double copies? 
Writing from San Diego
Jeff

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I&#039;ve no experience with it myself, but &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&amp;extid=1951022&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this plugin&lt;/a&gt; may scratch that itch. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello&#8211;I am looking for some advice on how to solve a problem in lightroom. Somehow we have multiple copies of thousands of photos and removing the doubles is so time consuming&#8211;photos are already &#8220;starred&#8221; and categorized. Is there some way to remove double copies?<br />
Writing from San Diego<br />
Jeff</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I&#8217;ve no experience with it myself, but <a href='http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&#038;extid=1951022' rel="nofollow">this plugin</a> may scratch that itch. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Delaney</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-41429</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-41429</guid>
		<description>Message for the Suggestion Box

Since the Kodak Gallery Upload Destination is probably the most widely used option, it would more helpful to have it listed as one of the first options under Settings.  (Actually, I didn&#039;t notice it was an option until about my 10th use of your software...

Take care,

CD

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t have completely free control of the order... I can only throw items above or below the standard Lr export sections. The thought I&#039;ve used for all these export plugins is that after you indicate what service/account you&#039;re using (something that doesn&#039;t change much on a per-service basis), you go through the selections for what kind of image to export, what size, what quality, etc., then where you want to to end up and what kind of metadata to use. It&#039;s okay, but any other order could arguably be better, but it&#039;s what I&#039;ve done for years.... &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message for the Suggestion Box</p>
<p>Since the Kodak Gallery Upload Destination is probably the most widely used option, it would more helpful to have it listed as one of the first options under Settings.  (Actually, I didn&#8217;t notice it was an option until about my 10th use of your software&#8230;</p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>CD</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t have completely free control of the order&#8230; I can only throw items above or below the standard Lr export sections. The thought I&#8217;ve used for all these export plugins is that after you indicate what service/account you&#8217;re using (something that doesn&#8217;t change much on a per-service basis), you go through the selections for what kind of image to export, what size, what quality, etc., then where you want to to end up and what kind of metadata to use. It&#8217;s okay, but any other order could arguably be better, but it&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve done for years&#8230;. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norman</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-41408</link>
		<dc:creator>norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-41408</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the sharing of software.  I had been an longtime Kodak Gallery user but finds the upload very frustrating as it has evolved but not friendly- downright stupid.

I am from Ancaster,Ont, Canada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the sharing of software.  I had been an longtime Kodak Gallery user but finds the upload very frustrating as it has evolved but not friendly- downright stupid.</p>
<p>I am from Ancaster,Ont, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-40861</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/kodak#comment-40861</guid>
		<description>I use MPIX for most printing jobs.Are you planning to develop a plugin for MPIX?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;No. I&#039;ve sent them multiple notes over the years, but have never even gotten a reply (and now I&#039;m no longer interested in trying). They partner with Zenfolio, for which there&#039;s a plugin, so it should be pretty painless to go via them. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use MPIX for most printing jobs.Are you planning to develop a plugin for MPIX?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>No. I&#8217;ve sent them multiple notes over the years, but have never even gotten a reply (and now I&#8217;m no longer interested in trying). They partner with Zenfolio, for which there&#8217;s a plugin, so it should be pretty painless to go via them. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

