Comments on: First Shots with a Cosina Voigtländer 125mm f/2.5 http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531 Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos. Wed, 23 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Joe http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531#comment-39382 Joe Sat, 19 Jun 2010 06:17:46 +0000 http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531#comment-39382 Jeffrey - Do you store images that are checked in your exif viewer? In other words, if I look at a censored photo in the exif viewer to make sure I successfully and securely censored it and the original uncensored image comes up, do I have to worry that the uncensored image will be stored or viewable by the public? <span class='jfriedl'>Not sure why you put the comment on this particular post, but yes, they are cached locally for a while to avoid having to refetch the same image over and over, and a robot cleans them out after a period of inactivity. If you change the image at the end of a URL after having checked it, the exif viewer won't notice the change right away, so yes, others checking the same link will see the old version for a while. I never considered this situation, but perhaps what I use when testing/debugging is useful: when viewing a photo with it, append “<b>&reload=1</b>” to the url (sans quotes) and hit enter, and that should have my system refetch the latest version. —Jeffrey</span> Jeffrey –

Do you store images that are checked in your exif viewer? In other words, if I look at a censored photo in the exif viewer to make sure I successfully and securely censored it and the original uncensored image comes up, do I have to worry that the uncensored image will be stored or viewable by the public?

Not sure why you put the comment on this particular post, but yes, they are cached locally for a while to avoid having to refetch the same image over and over, and a robot cleans them out after a period of inactivity. If you change the image at the end of a URL after having checked it, the exif viewer won’t notice the change right away, so yes, others checking the same link will see the old version for a while. I never considered this situation, but perhaps what I use when testing/debugging is useful: when viewing a photo with it, append “&reload=1” to the url (sans quotes) and hit enter, and that should have my system refetch the latest version. —Jeffrey

]]> By: Zachary http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531#comment-39131 Zachary Thu, 27 May 2010 23:20:26 +0000 http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531#comment-39131 Noooo! My one remaining lens advantage has now been eliminated..... Noooo! My one remaining lens advantage has now been eliminated…..

]]> By: ed http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531#comment-39130 ed Thu, 27 May 2010 21:02:44 +0000 http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-28/1531#comment-39130 Welcome to the CV125! It's a rare bird, maybe 2200 made in Nikon mount (http://forum.mflenses.com/voigtlaender-sl-apo-lanthar-serials-and-production-volumes-t24547.html) and I was lucky enough to land one over a year ago. It is, as you mentioned, in a league of its own. Remains to be seen if Cosina re-issues it in an SLII version. By the way, I think you meant to say this was the longest lens you've used WITHOUT vibration reduction (see above). <span class='jfriedl'>Oops, thanks that's what I get for writing at 1am. Fixed. Thanks for the link. —Jeffrey</span> Welcome to the CV125! It’s a rare bird, maybe 2200 made in Nikon mount (http://forum.mflenses.com/voigtlaender-sl-apo-lanthar-serials-and-production-volumes-t24547.html) and I was lucky enough to land one over a year ago. It is, as you mentioned, in a league of its own. Remains to be seen if Cosina re-issues it in an SLII version. By the way, I think you meant to say this was the longest lens you’ve used WITHOUT vibration reduction (see above).

Oops, thanks that’s what I get for writing at 1am. Fixed. Thanks for the link. —Jeffrey

]]>