<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unfortunate Sigma &#8220;Bigma&#8221; Enigma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: parv</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-39347</link>
		<dc:creator>parv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-39347</guid>
		<description>Sigma issued a statement about AF issue affecting some of the zooms ...

  http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/info_100616.htm


... affected lenses &amp; serial numbers are  ...

&lt;cite&gt;
APO   50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM  Serial Number between 10633051 and 10972000
APO 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM  Serial Number between 10574001 and 10972000
APO 150-500mm F5-6.3    DG OS HSM  Serial Number between 10674301 and 10972000
&lt;/cite&gt;

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Yeah, I saw that on DPReview today, and checked my new lens, and it&#039;s within the range. They say they&#039;ll fix it if you experience the problem, which I haven&#039;t with the new one, but then, I&#039;ve been &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/2010-06-08/1539&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;so busy lately&lt;/a&gt; that I haven&#039;t had a chance to really use it, beyond one day &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-30/1536&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;at KidZania&lt;/a&gt; &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma issued a statement about AF issue affecting some of the zooms &#8230;</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/info_100616.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/info_100616.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8230; affected lenses &amp; serial numbers are  &#8230;</p>
<p><cite><br />
APO   50-500mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM  Serial Number between 10633051 and 10972000<br />
APO 120-400mm F4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM  Serial Number between 10574001 and 10972000<br />
APO 150-500mm F5-6.3    DG OS HSM  Serial Number between 10674301 and 10972000<br />
</cite></p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Yeah, I saw that on DPReview today, and checked my new lens, and it&#8217;s within the range. They say they&#8217;ll fix it if you experience the problem, which I haven&#8217;t with the new one, but then, I&#8217;ve been <a href='http://regex.info/blog/2010-06-08/1539' rel="nofollow">so busy lately</a> that I haven&#8217;t had a chance to really use it, beyond one day <a href='http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-30/1536' rel="nofollow">at KidZania</a> &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Cutter</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38989</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Cutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 11:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38989</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had similair problems with my Sigma 18-250. I thought it was missing contact between lens and camera. I was about to send it in and then the problem stopped. It did start again but cleaning the flange helped. It looks like a quality control problem. Still don&#039;t know if I&#039;ll send it in or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had similair problems with my Sigma 18-250. I thought it was missing contact between lens and camera. I was about to send it in and then the problem stopped. It did start again but cleaning the flange helped. It looks like a quality control problem. Still don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ll send it in or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Friedl</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38952</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Friedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 03:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38952</guid>
		<description>So, are you creating a Sigma Bigma Enigma stigma?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are you creating a Sigma Bigma Enigma stigma?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38946</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 10:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38946</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried two Sigma lenses and have had similar wonkiness where the focus just seems to completely crap out and won&#039;t lock again until I detach and re-attach the lens.  The OS stopped working on one as well.  Needless to say they both went back and I&#039;ve just been sticking to Canon &#039;L&#039; glass since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried two Sigma lenses and have had similar wonkiness where the focus just seems to completely crap out and won&#8217;t lock again until I detach and re-attach the lens.  The OS stopped working on one as well.  Needless to say they both went back and I&#8217;ve just been sticking to Canon &#8216;L&#8217; glass since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parv</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38940</link>
		<dc:creator>parv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-05-07/1517#comment-38940</guid>
		<description>Did the wonkiness manifest without the teleconverter also (going by &quot;... you know you&#039;re zoomed at 1,000mm&quot;)?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Yes, it happened with or without the TC. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the wonkiness manifest without the teleconverter also (going by &#8220;&#8230; you know you&#8217;re zoomed at 1,000mm&#8221;)?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Yes, it happened with or without the TC. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

