<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Laugh at Your Puny 500mm Lens: Sigma Bigma at 1,000mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2010-04-21/1498/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-04-21/1498</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: icassell</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-04-21/1498#comment-38813</link>
		<dc:creator>icassell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-04-21/1498#comment-38813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been holding my breath waiting for reviews of this beast and appreciate your series.  There is no way I can afford a Canon 500mm f/4 and I want a lens to use with my 7D for birding.  How accurate and fast have you found the AF?  Have you tried any birds-in-flight?
&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Any attempt by me of BIF would fail, and it wouldn&#039;t be the lens to blame.  AF seems okay, but I haven&#039;t tested it a lot, but even at f/5.6, depth of field at 500mm is pretty thin, so I&#039;m not sure you&#039;d want to use AF anyway. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been holding my breath waiting for reviews of this beast and appreciate your series.  There is no way I can afford a Canon 500mm f/4 and I want a lens to use with my 7D for birding.  How accurate and fast have you found the AF?  Have you tried any birds-in-flight?<br />
<span class='jfriedl'>Any attempt by me of BIF would fail, and it wouldn&#8217;t be the lens to blame.  AF seems okay, but I haven&#8217;t tested it a lot, but even at f/5.6, depth of field at 500mm is pretty thin, so I&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;d want to use AF anyway. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nils</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2010-04-21/1498#comment-38795</link>
		<dc:creator>nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2010-04-21/1498#comment-38795</guid>
		<description>If I get up on the roof of my building and wave, maybe can you see me from your roof with that lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I get up on the roof of my building and wave, maybe can you see me from your roof with that lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

