<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthony-Designed Three-Seater StarWars&#8482; Figher Ship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shieh in Sunnyvale</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37428</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Shieh in Sunnyvale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37428</guid>
		<description>I recognize that space armor!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virtualsugar/4124293244/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recognize that space armor!<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/virtualsugar/4124293244/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/virtualsugar/4124293244/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Larsen</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37344</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37344</guid>
		<description>The Zeiss 100 f2 seems to be a recent addition. How do you like it? It is on my list, to gain a little  more reach than I get with the 24-70 f2.8. I tried one briefly and the manual focus is OK in combination with the D700. It does render backgrounds beautifully. It gets closer to the look of images from the Nikon 200 f2 than anything else I have seen.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I was borrowing Zak Braverman&#039;s while &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.kotodama.net/blog/2009/11/home-at-last/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;he was out of town&lt;/a&gt;. He had been raving about how wonderful it was, and I have to admit that after really using it for a while myself, I grew to appreciate it. The focus throw is very long, so you have very fine control over the focus. That, combined with a &lt;a href=&#039;http://regex.info/blog/2009-03-08/1159&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Katz Eye focus screen&lt;/a&gt; makes the manual focus a true pleasure. And the results just seem to have a crisp pop to them. And the macro aspect is nice; I don&#039;t have a macro lens. I&#039;ll probably get &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.dpreview.com/news/0911/09111602carlzeisszf2.asp&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one of the 2nd-generation versions&lt;/a&gt; announced earlier this week once they&#039;re available. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zeiss 100 f2 seems to be a recent addition. How do you like it? It is on my list, to gain a little  more reach than I get with the 24-70 f2.8. I tried one briefly and the manual focus is OK in combination with the D700. It does render backgrounds beautifully. It gets closer to the look of images from the Nikon 200 f2 than anything else I have seen.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I was borrowing Zak Braverman&#8217;s while <a href='http://www.kotodama.net/blog/2009/11/home-at-last/' rel="nofollow">he was out of town</a>. He had been raving about how wonderful it was, and I have to admit that after really using it for a while myself, I grew to appreciate it. The focus throw is very long, so you have very fine control over the focus. That, combined with a <a href='http://regex.info/blog/2009-03-08/1159' rel="nofollow">Katz Eye focus screen</a> makes the manual focus a true pleasure. And the results just seem to have a crisp pop to them. And the macro aspect is nice; I don&#8217;t have a macro lens. I&#8217;ll probably get <a href='http://www.dpreview.com/news/0911/09111602carlzeisszf2.asp' rel="nofollow">one of the 2nd-generation versions</a> announced earlier this week once they&#8217;re available. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parv</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37335</link>
		<dc:creator>parv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37335</guid>
		<description>I like the first canopy image. Intense reflection on the top tell there is a glass (ok, plastic) canopy on a &lt;i&gt;properly&lt;/i&gt; equipped spaceship. I would have liked to see nearer &amp; farther portions of the vehicle a bit more in focus; perhaps shot around f/16 if not laboring with focus stacking.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The problem with f/16, besides the lack of light, is that it makes it more difficult to hide how messy the background is. I&#039;d have to tidy the living room, and my dedication to blogging is not &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; strong. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first canopy image. Intense reflection on the top tell there is a glass (ok, plastic) canopy on a <i>properly</i> equipped spaceship. I would have liked to see nearer &#038; farther portions of the vehicle a bit more in focus; perhaps shot around f/16 if not laboring with focus stacking.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The problem with f/16, besides the lack of light, is that it makes it more difficult to hide how messy the background is. I&#8217;d have to tidy the living room, and my dedication to blogging is not <i>that</i> strong. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonal, MN</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37331</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonal, MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-11-19/1365#comment-37331</guid>
		<description>Very cool! How do you organize your multitude of Lego pieces ? Ours are all mixed up and show up just about everywhere. Does Anthony take part in putting them back? If you have some good suggestion please share. Thanks!

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;We have a big tub where they all get cleaned up to occasionally. We try to encourage him to clean up after himself, sometimes with the &#8220;If you don&#039;t clean it up, &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; will&#8221; stick (where in this case the meaning of Daddy &quot;cleaning up&quot; means &quot;disposing of&quot; :-) ) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool! How do you organize your multitude of Lego pieces ? Ours are all mixed up and show up just about everywhere. Does Anthony take part in putting them back? If you have some good suggestion please share. Thanks!</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>We have a big tub where they all get cleaned up to occasionally. We try to encourage him to clean up after himself, sometimes with the &#8220;If you don&#8217;t clean it up, <i>I</i> will&#8221; stick (where in this case the meaning of Daddy &#8220;cleaning up&#8221; means &#8220;disposing of&#8221; <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

