<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eclectic Photo Geeks at the Eclectic Music Concert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Evans</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36692</guid>
		<description>I think that Ricoh camera is a GX200.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Ricoh camera is a GX200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Pefley</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36691</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Pefley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36691</guid>
		<description>Fun series, Jeffrey. What is the Ricoh model? Almost appears to have an accessory finder ...

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t know the model (I didn&#039;t even know Ricoh was still in business, sorry), but it did indeed have an accessory finder. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun series, Jeffrey. What is the Ricoh model? Almost appears to have an accessory finder &#8230;</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t know the model (I didn&#8217;t even know Ricoh was still in business, sorry), but it did indeed have an accessory finder. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36690</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36690</guid>
		<description>E-gads! The 50/1.2 is gone! For shame. I fence-sat on my mediocre 50/1.4 AIS until I saw your shots; sold the old 1.4 and got the 1.2 instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-gads! The 50/1.2 is gone! For shame. I fence-sat on my mediocre 50/1.4 AIS until I saw your shots; sold the old 1.4 and got the 1.2 instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Evans</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2009-09-21/1317#comment-36687</guid>
		<description>The shot you included by Zak of the gentleman in the traditional clothing with the priceless shou instrument and the Ricoh camera is very interesting. -&gt; The way he is juggling the camera and the instrument speak to something about maybe balancing the old with the new. And yet all of is so quintesentially Japanese.  (Kyoto, the arts, the camera, the Shou, the outfit, etc.)  I&#039;m curious as to what the benefits of the Ricoh (is that a GX200?) camera were/are?

 Those low light shots are very warm  in their color.  Do you have to do a lot of post-shot work for these ?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t think any of these have any post-production work, except slight angle correction on one or two, and maybe a touch of crop here and there. On some I had tried correcting the white balance for the color of the predominantly incandescent light, but in the end preferred the warmer feel of the originals (I leave my D700&#039;s white-balance setting on &quot;Auto&quot;), so reverted back to that.  &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shot you included by Zak of the gentleman in the traditional clothing with the priceless shou instrument and the Ricoh camera is very interesting. -> The way he is juggling the camera and the instrument speak to something about maybe balancing the old with the new. And yet all of is so quintesentially Japanese.  (Kyoto, the arts, the camera, the Shou, the outfit, etc.)  I&#8217;m curious as to what the benefits of the Ricoh (is that a GX200?) camera were/are?</p>
<p> Those low light shots are very warm  in their color.  Do you have to do a lot of post-shot work for these ?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t think any of these have any post-production work, except slight angle correction on one or two, and maybe a touch of crop here and there. On some I had tried correcting the white balance for the color of the predominantly incandescent light, but in the end preferred the warmer feel of the originals (I leave my D700&#8242;s white-balance setting on &#8220;Auto&#8221;), so reverted back to that.  &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

