<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More From the Real Shogunzuka</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29811</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29811</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous shots, as always.  I&#039;ve been following your blog for several months, and I can&#039;t tell you how much I love your posts -- each one is like a precious mini-break from cubicle existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous shots, as always.  I&#8217;ve been following your blog for several months, and I can&#8217;t tell you how much I love your posts &#8212; each one is like a precious mini-break from cubicle existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29742</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29742</guid>
		<description>Regarding the marker, it&#039;d be niceif it had a reign name and year on it, but I&#039;d bet it doesn&#039;t.  IMHO,  I&#039;d say it  predates Meiji to a time when most traffic in Japan was on foot, hence the markers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the marker, it&#8217;d be niceif it had a reign name and year on it, but I&#8217;d bet it doesn&#8217;t.  IMHO,  I&#8217;d say it  predates Meiji to a time when most traffic in Japan was on foot, hence the markers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chng</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29693</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29693</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey,
I notice that your photo of the lookout taken with your D700 &amp; the 70-200mm VR, do not show any vignetting as reported by a few forums. Did you edit away the edges?
Alex

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The Nikkor 70-200 does vignette at higher zoom ranges, and my photos often show that, including the one you refer to (the one below &quot;The Real Overlook&quot;), but I also added just a hint of vignette on that one in Lightroom, so it&#039;s not a fair to judge with.  Actually, it&#039;s because I would see the vignette with the 70-200 since getting a full-frame body that I&#039;ve started to use vignette here and there on my images.... it can be a really nice effect. Of course, I wish that the 70-200 didn&#039;t force it on me, but in practice, it hasn&#039;t actually caused problems. I recall one image where I didn&#039;t want the slight vignette it gave, but quickly eliminated it with Lightroom&#039;s lens-correction vignette control.  &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey,<br />
I notice that your photo of the lookout taken with your D700 &amp; the 70-200mm VR, do not show any vignetting as reported by a few forums. Did you edit away the edges?<br />
Alex</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The Nikkor 70-200 does vignette at higher zoom ranges, and my photos often show that, including the one you refer to (the one below &#8220;The Real Overlook&#8221;), but I also added just a hint of vignette on that one in Lightroom, so it&#8217;s not a fair to judge with.  Actually, it&#8217;s because I would see the vignette with the 70-200 since getting a full-frame body that I&#8217;ve started to use vignette here and there on my images&#8230;. it can be a really nice effect. Of course, I wish that the 70-200 didn&#8217;t force it on me, but in practice, it hasn&#8217;t actually caused problems. I recall one image where I didn&#8217;t want the slight vignette it gave, but quickly eliminated it with Lightroom&#8217;s lens-correction vignette control.  &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britto</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29687</link>
		<dc:creator>britto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-12-04/1017#comment-29687</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

Wonderful snaps, especially the @One More Peek at the Lightup&quot; is a wonderful shot without a tripod. I guess your hands are stable ;-)
I am enjoying the fall colors of Kyoto from your blog. And it is wonderful.

Britto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Wonderful snaps, especially the @One More Peek at the Lightup&#8221; is a wonderful shot without a tripod. I guess your hands are stable <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I am enjoying the fall colors of Kyoto from your blog. And it is wonderful.</p>
<p>Britto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

