<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impossible Photography: No Light, No Tripod, No Hope. D700 and a 50mm f/1.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-40142</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-40142</guid>
		<description>Nice shots here -  I was a bit surprised that you didn&#039;t shoot  them at even higher ISO, shooting a 1.2 is really for special effects (like just getting the eyes and defocusing the rest) -  plus the D700 should be able to shoot easily higher ..  and with DxO you can even get a bit more headroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice shots here &#8211;  I was a bit surprised that you didn&#8217;t shoot  them at even higher ISO, shooting a 1.2 is really for special effects (like just getting the eyes and defocusing the rest) &#8211;  plus the D700 should be able to shoot easily higher ..  and with DxO you can even get a bit more headroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksporry</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-34218</link>
		<dc:creator>ksporry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-34218</guid>
		<description>Wow, jeffrey, your shots are in the same league as Sushi-Jeff&#039;s! Good stuff!
Wish I could afford a D700 with lenses... I guess my poor 5D will have to do for now ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, jeffrey, your shots are in the same league as Sushi-Jeff&#8217;s! Good stuff!<br />
Wish I could afford a D700 with lenses&#8230; I guess my poor 5D will have to do for now ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJ</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20860</link>
		<dc:creator>LJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20860</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and shots, I agree with Zak above about dropping the exposure slightly. How many off focus shots did you get? I&#039;m seriously tempted by the D700 (or what ever comes next) due to the FF sensor and dynamic range + high ISO abilities, but until I can replace the screen with one that makes the use of fast manual focus primes as easy as it should be I&#039;m not spending a penny on moving on from the D40 I&#039;m using; which, combined with the 50mm f1.2 has shown me exactly how bad Nikon&#039;s stock focus screens really are.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I don&#039;t understand the comment about &quot;off focus shots&quot;.... are you somehow implying that I might make a mistake from time to time?! Blasphemy! :-)  Actually, most were fine because I didn&#039;t take all that many shots to begin with, and I knew that focus would be an issue, so I was careful. There&#039;s one shot that&#039;s quite out of focus, and I sort of like the effect I ended up with, so perhaps I&#039;ll post it. As for the focus screen, wow, it&#039;s hard to believe how bad the stock Nikon one is for manual focus until you get to enjoy a good one for a while, then have to go back. Ugh. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and shots, I agree with Zak above about dropping the exposure slightly. How many off focus shots did you get? I&#8217;m seriously tempted by the D700 (or what ever comes next) due to the FF sensor and dynamic range + high ISO abilities, but until I can replace the screen with one that makes the use of fast manual focus primes as easy as it should be I&#8217;m not spending a penny on moving on from the D40 I&#8217;m using; which, combined with the 50mm f1.2 has shown me exactly how bad Nikon&#8217;s stock focus screens really are.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t understand the comment about &#8220;off focus shots&#8221;&#8230;. are you somehow implying that I might make a mistake from time to time?! Blasphemy! <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Actually, most were fine because I didn&#8217;t take all that many shots to begin with, and I knew that focus would be an issue, so I was careful. There&#8217;s one shot that&#8217;s quite out of focus, and I sort of like the effect I ended up with, so perhaps I&#8217;ll post it. As for the focus screen, wow, it&#8217;s hard to believe how bad the stock Nikon one is for manual focus until you get to enjoy a good one for a while, then have to go back. Ugh. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20536</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20536</guid>
		<description>Great photos, serving to increase my D700 lust even further, if such a thing is possible. 

However, I would like to see them a bit darker. After all, it is nighttime, and even though the combination of lens and camera can make it seem much brighter than it actually is, I think that, as photographs, they would in general look better with -0.7 exposure compensation or so. After all, the camera doesn&#039;t know it&#039;s nighttime, and the metering system is struggling to get to 18% grey. At least to my eye, more darkness and shadow would have made for more interesting photos, at least for most of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photos, serving to increase my D700 lust even further, if such a thing is possible. </p>
<p>However, I would like to see them a bit darker. After all, it is nighttime, and even though the combination of lens and camera can make it seem much brighter than it actually is, I think that, as photographs, they would in general look better with -0.7 exposure compensation or so. After all, the camera doesn&#8217;t know it&#8217;s nighttime, and the metering system is struggling to get to 18% grey. At least to my eye, more darkness and shadow would have made for more interesting photos, at least for most of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Van Dalen</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Van Dalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20483</guid>
		<description>BTW, &quot;Discards&quot; by far my favorite from this set.  Rare to see you taking &quot;people pics&quot; would like to see more of that.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I appreciate the kind words, but I&#039;m missing something in the connection to the &quot;people pics&quot; comment. (Perhaps I don&#039;t know what &quot;people pics&quot; means, but my first guess would be &quot;pictures of people&quot; :-) ) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, &#8220;Discards&#8221; by far my favorite from this set.  Rare to see you taking &#8220;people pics&#8221; would like to see more of that.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I appreciate the kind words, but I&#8217;m missing something in the connection to the &#8220;people pics&#8221; comment. (Perhaps I don&#8217;t know what &#8220;people pics&#8221; means, but my first guess would be &#8220;pictures of people&#8221; <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnL</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20461</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20461</guid>
		<description>Sorry nope not that John.   It&#039;s John from VA (I will change my handle to JohnL).      Meter wise D200 is still a bit better than the D700 IMHO.  I took some shots with the D700 w 50mm f1.4 at Coney Island during my NYC Labor day weekend trip and I ended up setting exposure comp to -0.7 because some shots were over exposed (it was a bit sunny that day)...  I had ADR set to Auto so maybe that was the culprit.

Went to Kyoto last March, beautiful place. can&#039;t wait to return next year.  n times better than where I live now (neighbor to the breaucrats --&gt; Washington DC).

My 17-35mm arrived so I will go do some shooting this weekend. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry nope not that John.   It&#8217;s John from VA (I will change my handle to JohnL).      Meter wise D200 is still a bit better than the D700 IMHO.  I took some shots with the D700 w 50mm f1.4 at Coney Island during my NYC Labor day weekend trip and I ended up setting exposure comp to -0.7 because some shots were over exposed (it was a bit sunny that day)&#8230;  I had ADR set to Auto so maybe that was the culprit.</p>
<p>Went to Kyoto last March, beautiful place. can&#8217;t wait to return next year.  n times better than where I live now (neighbor to the breaucrats &#8211;&gt; Washington DC).</p>
<p>My 17-35mm arrived so I will go do some shooting this weekend. <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Van Dalen</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Van Dalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20448</guid>
		<description>Hey, wasn&#039;t that &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; angelic wife? :) 

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;The &quot;John&quot; above wasn&#039;t you? I figured that you were just trying the &#039;h&#039; on for size... :-) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;

Glad you got to test out your D700.  I think the metering has changed quite a bit over the last few years with Nikon.  They went very different with the D80 and have been toning it back ever since.  To me, the D700 is capturing the most usable range I have experienced so far.  There is almost never a time that whites are unrecoverable in Lightroom.

Looking forward to more pictures... especially at dawn, dusk and even night!  I need to shoot more myself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, wasn&#8217;t that <i>my</i> angelic wife? <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>The &#8220;John&#8221; above wasn&#8217;t you? I figured that you were just trying the &#8216;h&#8217; on for size&#8230; <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
<p>Glad you got to test out your D700.  I think the metering has changed quite a bit over the last few years with Nikon.  They went very different with the D80 and have been toning it back ever since.  To me, the D700 is capturing the most usable range I have experienced so far.  There is almost never a time that whites are unrecoverable in Lightroom.</p>
<p>Looking forward to more pictures&#8230; especially at dawn, dusk and even night!  I need to shoot more myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20435</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20435</guid>
		<description>How do you like the D700?  I got mine in July and I love it.  The viewfinder is an item from god!  Way better than the tiny one on my old D200 (Which I still love).   Now I am waiting for my 17-35mm to arrive from the shop :)

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I saw your post about how your angelic wife surprised you with the D700, and it made me all the more anxious to get my hands on mine (which I&#039;d ordered right away, but it arrived the day after I left for The States). Of course, the low-light performance is great, but there are a few &quot;issues&quot; I&#039;ve not yet worked out. Sometimes the on-screen image playback goes wacky, as if I&#039;m looking at a 50&#039;s TV with poor reception. The files themselves are fine when I move them from the card, so I dunno what the problem might be. I also find that the metering doesn&#039;t seem as good as the D200, but since I&#039;ve not yet read the manual, it&#039;s not really fair to blame the camera over my own ignorance, so understanding how the metering might differ from the D200 is something on my to-to list.  &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you like the D700?  I got mine in July and I love it.  The viewfinder is an item from god!  Way better than the tiny one on my old D200 (Which I still love).   Now I am waiting for my 17-35mm to arrive from the shop <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I saw your post about how your angelic wife surprised you with the D700, and it made me all the more anxious to get my hands on mine (which I&#8217;d ordered right away, but it arrived the day after I left for The States). Of course, the low-light performance is great, but there are a few &#8220;issues&#8221; I&#8217;ve not yet worked out. Sometimes the on-screen image playback goes wacky, as if I&#8217;m looking at a 50&#8242;s TV with poor reception. The files themselves are fine when I move them from the card, so I dunno what the problem might be. I also find that the metering doesn&#8217;t seem as good as the D200, but since I&#8217;ve not yet read the manual, it&#8217;s not really fair to blame the camera over my own ignorance, so understanding how the metering might differ from the D200 is something on my to-to list.  &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalyan VArma</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20410</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalyan VArma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20410</guid>
		<description>Amazing photographs. I have my eyes set on this camera and your pics now make me wanna go out and pick it up right now :)

Whats the status of the 12-24mm on this body ?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Nice to see you back, Kalyan.  The 12-24/4 is a DX lens, so you&#039;d either get a 6MP image when the sensor is in DX mode, or if you force FX mode, one would expect softness and vignetting at the edges. (Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&#039;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=29298771&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digital Photography Review post that discusses the 12-24/4 on an FX sensor&lt;/a&gt;.) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing photographs. I have my eyes set on this camera and your pics now make me wanna go out and pick it up right now <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Whats the status of the 12-24mm on this body ?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Nice to see you back, Kalyan.  The 12-24/4 is a DX lens, so you&#8217;d either get a 6MP image when the sensor is in DX mode, or if you force FX mode, one would expect softness and vignetting at the edges. (Here&#8217;s a <a href='http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=29298771' rel="nofollow">Digital Photography Review post that discusses the 12-24/4 on an FX sensor</a>.) &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935#comment-20375</guid>
		<description>I know nothing about photography, but these pictures make me want to a) buy a Nikon D700, and b) Take up a serious hobby in photography

These pictures are seriously cool!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know nothing about photography, but these pictures make me want to a) buy a Nikon D700, and b) Take up a serious hobby in photography</p>
<p>These pictures are seriously cool!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

