<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FotoSharp 16&#8243; Camera RainCoat</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-13184</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-13184</guid>
					<description>A question:  you recommend the RainCoat without the velcro tripod/hand hole...any reason for that preference?  

Love your reflections on life in Kyoto, both verbal and pictorial.  From the beauty to the fashion mistakes.

&lt;span class='jfriedl'&gt;I recommended the one that I bought; I've never tried the other one. I chose the one without the Velcro opening because I don't imagine I'd do much tripod work in the rain, and I'd imagine that the bulk and complexity imparted by the Velcro would thrust the thing past my threshold for "ease of use". (It is perhaps telling that something so slight -- a Velcro closure -- could be considered bulky and complex, but the thing without it is simplicity incarnate, a feature I prize highly :-) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question:  you recommend the RainCoat without the velcro tripod/hand hole&#8230;any reason for that preference?  </p>
<p>Love your reflections on life in Kyoto, both verbal and pictorial.  From the beauty to the fashion mistakes.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I recommended the one that I bought; I&#8217;ve never tried the other one. I chose the one without the Velcro opening because I don&#8217;t imagine I&#8217;d do much tripod work in the rain, and I&#8217;d imagine that the bulk and complexity imparted by the Velcro would thrust the thing past my threshold for &#8220;ease of use&#8221;. (It is perhaps telling that something so slight &#8212; a Velcro closure &#8212; could be considered bulky and complex, but the thing without it is simplicity incarnate, a feature I prize highly <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &mdash;Jeffrey</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marcina</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-12644</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-12644</guid>
					<description>You know, I have one of those, too.   Except mine is called Plastic Grocery Bag With A Hole In The Bottom.    It's the same translucent white.     It keeps off rain.    It scrunches into a small ball for transport.    And if I want it to be in a cute tube shape, it would take about 5 seconds and some tape.    And it DIDN'T cost $30.00  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have one of those, too.   Except mine is called Plastic Grocery Bag With A Hole In The Bottom.    It&#8217;s the same translucent white.     It keeps off rain.    It scrunches into a small ball for transport.    And if I want it to be in a cute tube shape, it would take about 5 seconds and some tape.    And it DIDN&#8217;T cost $30.00  <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
