<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FotoSharp 16&#8243; Camera RainCoat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-13184</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-13184</guid>
		<description>A question:  you recommend the RainCoat without the velcro tripod/hand hole...any reason for that preference?  

Love your reflections on life in Kyoto, both verbal and pictorial.  From the beauty to the fashion mistakes.

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;I recommended the one that I bought; I&#039;ve never tried the other one. I chose the one without the Velcro opening because I don&#039;t imagine I&#039;d do much tripod work in the rain, and I&#039;d imagine that the bulk and complexity imparted by the Velcro would thrust the thing past my threshold for &quot;ease of use&quot;. (It is perhaps telling that something so slight -- a Velcro closure -- could be considered bulky and complex, but the thing without it is simplicity incarnate, a feature I prize highly :-) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question:  you recommend the RainCoat without the velcro tripod/hand hole&#8230;any reason for that preference?  </p>
<p>Love your reflections on life in Kyoto, both verbal and pictorial.  From the beauty to the fashion mistakes.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I recommended the one that I bought; I&#8217;ve never tried the other one. I chose the one without the Velcro opening because I don&#8217;t imagine I&#8217;d do much tripod work in the rain, and I&#8217;d imagine that the bulk and complexity imparted by the Velcro would thrust the thing past my threshold for &#8220;ease of use&#8221;. (It is perhaps telling that something so slight &#8212; a Velcro closure &#8212; could be considered bulky and complex, but the thing without it is simplicity incarnate, a feature I prize highly <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcina</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-12644</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-12-19/664#comment-12644</guid>
		<description>You know, I have one of those, too.   Except mine is called Plastic Grocery Bag With A Hole In The Bottom.    It&#039;s the same translucent white.     It keeps off rain.    It scrunches into a small ball for transport.    And if I want it to be in a cute tube shape, it would take about 5 seconds and some tape.    And it DIDN&#039;T cost $30.00  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have one of those, too.   Except mine is called Plastic Grocery Bag With A Hole In The Bottom.    It&#8217;s the same translucent white.     It keeps off rain.    It scrunches into a small ball for transport.    And if I want it to be in a cute tube shape, it would take about 5 seconds and some tape.    And it DIDN&#8217;T cost $30.00  <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

