<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D300 / D3 Announcements</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: William</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8404</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8404</guid>
					<description>That is really a nice camera - get it IF you think the D300 does something that your D200 absolute can never do AND you need that feature.  Only reason I'd move off my 6MP body is if there's a body that can very closely achieve what I'm now addicted to  in depth and resolution:  Slide film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really a nice camera - get it IF you think the D300 does something that your D200 absolute can never do AND you need that feature.  Only reason I&#8217;d move off my 6MP body is if there&#8217;s a body that can very closely achieve what I&#8217;m now addicted to  in depth and resolution:  Slide film.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marcina</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8255</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8255</guid>
					<description>No no no!   A photographer of your caliber oughtn't wait.   You NEED the D300.   You MUST have it.   The D200 is not worthy of you.   It should be removed from your esteemed presence immediatly.   I'll take it off your hands - again, out of sisterly love entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no no!   A photographer of your caliber oughtn&#8217;t wait.   You NEED the D300.   You MUST have it.   The D200 is not worthy of you.   It should be removed from your esteemed presence immediatly.   I&#8217;ll take it off your hands - again, out of sisterly love entirely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zak</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8254</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8254</guid>
					<description>Yes, I was (am) drooling too... It's way out of my league and I could never justify it, but that D3 is one beautiful piece of technology, too. The new 24-70 might find it's way into my hands sometime in the next year, assuming I'm convinced it's worth the money, but the rest will have to wait, perhaps forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was (am) drooling too&#8230; It&#8217;s way out of my league and I could never justify it, but that D3 is one beautiful piece of technology, too. The new 24-70 might find it&#8217;s way into my hands sometime in the next year, assuming I&#8217;m convinced it&#8217;s worth the money, but the rest will have to wait, perhaps forever.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
