<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D300 / D3 Announcements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8404</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8404</guid>
		<description>That is really a nice camera - get it IF you think the D300 does something that your D200 absolute can never do AND you need that feature.  Only reason I&#039;d move off my 6MP body is if there&#039;s a body that can very closely achieve what I&#039;m now addicted to  in depth and resolution:  Slide film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really a nice camera &#8211; get it IF you think the D300 does something that your D200 absolute can never do AND you need that feature.  Only reason I&#8217;d move off my 6MP body is if there&#8217;s a body that can very closely achieve what I&#8217;m now addicted to  in depth and resolution:  Slide film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcina</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>No no no!   A photographer of your caliber oughtn&#039;t wait.   You NEED the D300.   You MUST have it.   The D200 is not worthy of you.   It should be removed from your esteemed presence immediatly.   I&#039;ll take it off your hands - again, out of sisterly love entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no no!   A photographer of your caliber oughtn&#8217;t wait.   You NEED the D300.   You MUST have it.   The D200 is not worthy of you.   It should be removed from your esteemed presence immediatly.   I&#8217;ll take it off your hands &#8211; again, out of sisterly love entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-08-23/552#comment-8254</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was (am) drooling too... It&#039;s way out of my league and I could never justify it, but that D3 is one beautiful piece of technology, too. The new 24-70 might find it&#039;s way into my hands sometime in the next year, assuming I&#039;m convinced it&#039;s worth the money, but the rest will have to wait, perhaps forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was (am) drooling too&#8230; It&#8217;s way out of my league and I could never justify it, but that D3 is one beautiful piece of technology, too. The new 24-70 might find it&#8217;s way into my hands sometime in the next year, assuming I&#8217;m convinced it&#8217;s worth the money, but the rest will have to wait, perhaps forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

