<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 1.1 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Strachan</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-7518</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Strachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-7518</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey,
Nice work here. I&#039;ve just got LR1.1 and found a major problem. Pictures viwed in it look very much warmer than they do in Photoshop. I&#039;m talking about the same pictures with the same settings. In LR they look as if the WB has been boosted but the figures show it&#039;s exactly the same. One picture, a PSD,  into which I pasted a white background looks quite yellow in  LR. Any idea what&#039;s happening?

Cheers

Laurie Strachan

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;(Laurie followed up later via email. The problem had been with her system&#039;s monitor profile. &#8212;Jeffrey)&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey,<br />
Nice work here. I&#8217;ve just got LR1.1 and found a major problem. Pictures viwed in it look very much warmer than they do in Photoshop. I&#8217;m talking about the same pictures with the same settings. In LR they look as if the WB has been boosted but the figures show it&#8217;s exactly the same. One picture, a PSD,  into which I pasted a white background looks quite yellow in  LR. Any idea what&#8217;s happening?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Laurie Strachan</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>(Laurie followed up later via email. The problem had been with her system&#8217;s monitor profile. &mdash;Jeffrey)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudolph de Jong</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolph de Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6918</guid>
		<description>Metadata Viewer:  A genuinely helpful tool, showing just what you need -- and no more -- of the metadata; I found shortening/deleting captions especially worthwhile.  Noticed in the Adobe Forum the huge number of weird problems with displaying proper capture date. 
No more!  Sure beats editing the arcane templates in the metadata folder.

BTW: Does one still need to create a new &quot;Metadata Field List&quot; subfolder, rather than placing the newly generated  .lrtemplate preset in the existing (ver 1.1) &quot;Metadata Presets&quot; folder?

&lt;span class=&#039;jfriedl&#039;&gt;Yes, you still need the new folder. The Metadata Presets folder is for the assign-this-value-to-this-field presets that you can apply to images. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;

Thanks, Jeffrey &amp; Regards: -=Rudy=-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metadata Viewer:  A genuinely helpful tool, showing just what you need &#8212; and no more &#8212; of the metadata; I found shortening/deleting captions especially worthwhile.  Noticed in the Adobe Forum the huge number of weird problems with displaying proper capture date.<br />
No more!  Sure beats editing the arcane templates in the metadata folder.</p>
<p>BTW: Does one still need to create a new &#8220;Metadata Field List&#8221; subfolder, rather than placing the newly generated  .lrtemplate preset in the existing (ver 1.1) &#8220;Metadata Presets&#8221; folder?</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Yes, you still need the new folder. The Metadata Presets folder is for the assign-this-value-to-this-field presets that you can apply to images. &mdash;Jeffrey</span></p>
<p>Thanks, Jeffrey &amp; Regards: -=Rudy=-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank M.</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>Nice work, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maciej</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6465</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6465</guid>
		<description>Very usefull coments. Anyway your whole site is very interesting. I will be visiting often !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very usefull coments. Anyway your whole site is very interesting. I will be visiting often !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Kiel</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6463</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Kiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6463</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all your work again. I just installed LR 1.1 and my Metadata Viewer Preset still works. I will have a look at your new builder later on to improve my preset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all your work again. I just installed LR 1.1 and my Metadata Viewer Preset still works. I will have a look at your new builder later on to improve my preset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Walker</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6417</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2007-06-27/502#comment-6417</guid>
		<description>Nice work Jeffrey !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Jeffrey !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

