<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Lens Focus Issues Are Fixed, or &#8220;I Told You So&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: James Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-19854</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-19854</guid>
					<description>Thanks for this page. I have a bad front-focus problem on my 17-55 f2.8 DX lens at the 17 mm end. I posted a question on the Nikonians lens forum, and the only reply so far is from a certain "Len Shepherd" who was explaining that I don't understand how to use AF on my D200 correctly!

I've lodged the problem with the Nikon UK website. Hopefully I can get the lens calibrated. I will plan to send them the lens only, since the D200 focuses every other lens I own perfectly.

&lt;span class='jfriedl'&gt;Don't worry about the "Len Shepherd" notes. He's either a robot who blindly responds with "you are stupid! You know nothing!" notes to every post, or a fairly pathetic human who does the same. &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this page. I have a bad front-focus problem on my 17-55 f2.8 DX lens at the 17 mm end. I posted a question on the Nikonians lens forum, and the only reply so far is from a certain &#8220;Len Shepherd&#8221; who was explaining that I don&#8217;t understand how to use AF on my D200 correctly!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve lodged the problem with the Nikon UK website. Hopefully I can get the lens calibrated. I will plan to send them the lens only, since the D200 focuses every other lens I own perfectly.</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>Don&#8217;t worry about the &#8220;Len Shepherd&#8221; notes. He&#8217;s either a robot who blindly responds with &#8220;you are stupid! You know nothing!&#8221; notes to every post, or a fairly pathetic human who does the same. &mdash;Jeffrey</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian C</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-17586</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-17586</guid>
					<description>Hi Jeffrey, thank you for the excellent article and test chart.
I have the D300 and 18-200 VR lens and have always been a bit disappointed with the crispness of the focus -(i.e. it wasn't!). This was especially annoying as the 18-200 lens performed really well on my previous D70s. 
So, having used the chart and your instructions I have found that the sharpness in the lens  achieves acceptable quality using the AF Fine Tune - using a setting of -16! 
I am not sure whether that means I should get the camera / lens recalibrated by  Nikon? Any thoughts. I do not have any other lenses at the moment. Are there any downsides to just running as it is?
Many thanks again.
Brian

&lt;span class='jfriedl'&gt;I don't have a D300, but I think the whole point of the AF fine Tune feature is to use it exactly as you've done. If it now focuses well, count your blessings and go take some pictures :-) &#8212;Jeffrey&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey, thank you for the excellent article and test chart.<br />
I have the D300 and 18-200 VR lens and have always been a bit disappointed with the crispness of the focus -(i.e. it wasn&#8217;t!). This was especially annoying as the 18-200 lens performed really well on my previous D70s.<br />
So, having used the chart and your instructions I have found that the sharpness in the lens  achieves acceptable quality using the AF Fine Tune - using a setting of -16!<br />
I am not sure whether that means I should get the camera / lens recalibrated by  Nikon? Any thoughts. I do not have any other lenses at the moment. Are there any downsides to just running as it is?<br />
Many thanks again.<br />
Brian</p>
<p><span class='jfriedl'>I don&#8217;t have a D300, but I think the whole point of the AF fine Tune feature is to use it exactly as you&#8217;ve done. If it now focuses well, count your blessings and go take some pictures <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  &mdash;Jeffrey</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Oard</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-7181</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-7181</guid>
					<description>Jeffrey,
thanks for your persistence and method in dealing with your camera/lens issues.
I have a d80, a 50 1.8, 18-200 vr and a new 70-200 2.8.
I have found that the  70-200 is not as sharp as it should be.
I have taken test shots with your chart and the 50mm and the 70-200. Both appearr to show backfocus. I would appreciate if you would look at the shots.
Best Regards,
Michael Oard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey,<br />
thanks for your persistence and method in dealing with your camera/lens issues.<br />
I have a d80, a 50 1.8, 18-200 vr and a new 70-200 2.8.<br />
I have found that the  70-200 is not as sharp as it should be.<br />
I have taken test shots with your chart and the 50mm and the 70-200. Both appearr to show backfocus. I would appreciate if you would look at the shots.<br />
Best Regards,<br />
Michael Oard
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nils</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-3115</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2007-01-19/363#comment-3115</guid>
					<description>Congratulations, you must be very relieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, you must be very relieved.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
