Except that the standard for trademark infringement is whether it would create confusion for the “typical consumer”. I doubt the court would find that the typical cell-phone buyer would pay that close attention to the transport medium.

For use in G&S (Goods and Services) “computer hardware and software for providing integrated telephone communication with computerized global information networks.”

It’s definitely a broad-reaching enough definition that Cisco has a pretty decent chance of making it stick, however, Apple could make a counter-claim that their telephone communications *aren’t* “integrated..with computerized global information networks” (as Cisco VOIP are, traversing the Internet or other computer networks), but are instead traversing the regional cellular networks, which are a completely different transport medium.

So yes, it was a completely gimp move on Apple’s part to do it, but it isn’t *quite* as clear-cut as it might seem at face value.