<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My New Computer is Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bananananana</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator>bananananana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-3740</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that both Tabbrowser Preferences and TabMixPlus break the address bar search, regardless of the value of keyword.URL in about:config. TabMixPlus has useful functions but it&#039;s very bloated, and it messes with settings that have nothing to do with tabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that both Tabbrowser Preferences and TabMixPlus break the address bar search, regardless of the value of keyword.URL in about:config. TabMixPlus has useful functions but it&#8217;s very bloated, and it messes with settings that have nothing to do with tabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew S</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>You can save a few pixels of screen space by removing the useless &quot;go&quot; button:

browser.urlbar.hideGoButton: true

(it also wins the award for the most poorly named preference)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tmp.garyr.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tab Mix Plus&lt;/a&gt; is a good replacement for Tabbrowser Preferences, and includes a session saving/restoring feature that is more powerful than the one built in to Firefox 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can save a few pixels of screen space by removing the useless &#8220;go&#8221; button:</p>
<p>browser.urlbar.hideGoButton: true</p>
<p>(it also wins the award for the most poorly named preference)</p>
<p><a href="http://tmp.garyr.net/" rel="nofollow">Tab Mix Plus</a> is a good replacement for Tabbrowser Preferences, and includes a session saving/restoring feature that is more powerful than the one built in to Firefox 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Friedl</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Friedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>Excellent suggestion, Brian, thanks. It turns out that yes, Tabbrowser Preferences is dorking it. I&#039;ll try running without it and see what I miss. (I have the feeling that much of what made Tabbrowser Preferences such an excellent extension was included in the mainline Firefox 1.5 build, and likely continues to this 2.x build. We&#039;ll see)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent suggestion, Brian, thanks. It turns out that yes, Tabbrowser Preferences is dorking it. I&#8217;ll try running without it and see what I miss. (I have the feeling that much of what made Tabbrowser Preferences such an excellent extension was included in the mainline Firefox 1.5 build, and likely continues to this 2.x build. We&#8217;ll see)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Friedl</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Friedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2923</guid>
		<description>20&quot;, which I bought when I moved to Japan (2.5 years ago)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20&#8243;, which I bought when I moved to Japan (2.5 years ago)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Zawodny</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zawodny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2920</guid>
		<description>Which monitor is that?  The 20, 24, or 30&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which monitor is that?  The 20, 24, or 30&#8243;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask Bjørn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask Bjørn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>Yes, the new Core 2 Duo processors are great!

I replaced an old AMD processor with one of those in our fileserver at home and even with ~7-10 disks (7 then, 10 now) it made a HUGE difference in how much heat it emits.


&lt;i&gt;Spent ages moving files over from the old computer. I&#039;m still not done.&lt;/i&gt;

Apple have done a really nice job on that in OS X.  Start up new computer.  Put old computer in &quot;target disk mode&quot;.  Plug in firewire cable in both.  Wait a little while.  Now your new computer looks and acts just like the old one, except faster. 

I used it for my G4 PowerBook to MacBook Pro upgrade and it was Really Smooth.  My mother used it for her iBook to MacBook upgrade and again, completely smooth sailing.

 - ask</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the new Core 2 Duo processors are great!</p>
<p>I replaced an old AMD processor with one of those in our fileserver at home and even with ~7-10 disks (7 then, 10 now) it made a HUGE difference in how much heat it emits.</p>
<p><i>Spent ages moving files over from the old computer. I&#8217;m still not done.</i></p>
<p>Apple have done a really nice job on that in OS X.  Start up new computer.  Put old computer in &#8220;target disk mode&#8221;.  Plug in firewire cable in both.  Wait a little while.  Now your new computer looks and acts just like the old one, except faster. </p>
<p>I used it for my G4 PowerBook to MacBook Pro upgrade and it was Really Smooth.  My mother used it for her iBook to MacBook upgrade and again, completely smooth sailing.</p>
<p> &#8211; ask</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Acton</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Acton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-26/315#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>It is possible that one of your extensions is interfering with the address bar search.

One possible workaround for your address bar problem: learn to use search shortcuts. 

http://www.tedcarnahan.com/2006/10/02/custom-firefox-search-shortcuts/

The way that I have set it up, I perform the following actions: yquery

I have similar shortcuts set up for &#039;g&#039;, &#039;az&#039;, etc which lets me choose which search engine. I have completed disabled the separate search box since I find the keyboard approach much more intuitive. I also like getting the screen real estate back.

Granted, it requires an extra 2 keystrokes, it does give you slightly more power and flexibility.

--b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible that one of your extensions is interfering with the address bar search.</p>
<p>One possible workaround for your address bar problem: learn to use search shortcuts. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tedcarnahan.com/2006/10/02/custom-firefox-search-shortcuts/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tedcarnahan.com/2006/10/02/custom-firefox-search-shortcuts/</a></p>
<p>The way that I have set it up, I perform the following actions: yquery</p>
<p>I have similar shortcuts set up for &#8216;g&#8217;, &#8216;az&#8217;, etc which lets me choose which search engine. I have completed disabled the separate search box since I find the keyboard approach much more intuitive. I also like getting the screen real estate back.</p>
<p>Granted, it requires an extra 2 keystrokes, it does give you slightly more power and flexibility.</p>
<p>&#8211;b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

