<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthony The Star of His School Play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-16/310/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-16/310</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask Bjørn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-16/310#comment-2898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask Bjørn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-16/310#comment-2898</guid>
		<description>Until the last paragraph I thought you meant the 300mm 2.8 which is &quot;only&quot; ~$4-5000.

Here&#039;s another page about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/nikkoresources/telephotos/300mmedif20/index.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;300mm/2.0&lt;/a&gt;.  Woah.  That&#039;s really crazy.   I wonder if the case came with wheels ...   Bjørn Rørslett has it on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_tele.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his telephoto lenses&lt;/a&gt; list, too.

Nikon&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.naturfotograf.com/AFS70-200VR_rev00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;70-200mm/2.8&lt;/a&gt; is relatively more affordable and quite a splendid lens, too.   I have one that I use on average once a year – while not 7kg it&#039;s still a pain to bring anywhere.



 - ask</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the last paragraph I thought you meant the 300mm 2.8 which is &#8220;only&#8221; ~$4-5000.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another page about the <a href="http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/nikkoresources/telephotos/300mmedif20/index.htm" rel="nofollow">300mm/2.0</a>.  Woah.  That&#8217;s really crazy.   I wonder if the case came with wheels &#8230;   Bjørn Rørslett has it on <a href="http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_tele.html" rel="nofollow">his telephoto lenses</a> list, too.</p>
<p>Nikon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.naturfotograf.com/AFS70-200VR_rev00.html" rel="nofollow">70-200mm/2.8</a> is relatively more affordable and quite a splendid lens, too.   I have one that I use on average once a year – while not 7kg it&#8217;s still a pain to bring anywhere.</p>
<p> &#8211; ask</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

