<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Ironic News Headline</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-3264</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-3264</guid>
					<description>I've never heard anyone offended by "Xmas" before, but the reason to use it in a headline is that it is considerably shorter than "Christmas", and can therefore more easily fit in narrow newspaper columns.  This usage has nothing to do with pushing a political agenda one way or the other, or x-ing out Christ's name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard anyone offended by &#8220;Xmas&#8221; before, but the reason to use it in a headline is that it is considerably shorter than &#8220;Christmas&#8221;, and can therefore more easily fit in narrow newspaper columns.  This usage has nothing to do with pushing a political agenda one way or the other, or x-ing out Christ&#8217;s name.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sam</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2861</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2861</guid>
					<description>I'd point out that you're probably not correct to blame Tom Breen -- it's usually the copy editors who write headlines.  

As for the "standard usage", I thought "xmas" was relatively standard usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d point out that you&#8217;re probably not correct to blame Tom Breen &#8212; it&#8217;s usually the copy editors who write headlines.  </p>
<p>As for the &#8220;standard usage&#8221;, I thought &#8220;xmas&#8221; was relatively standard usage.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon P. Chappell</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2854</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2854</guid>
					<description>I'm with Jeffrey on this one. As an apostolic (upci.org) Christian, I understand that the X in Xmas is the initial letter of the Greek word for Christ. That said, I still find it lazy usage. If you're that keen on Greek, then write it all in Greek or stick to the standard english/american usage please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Jeffrey on this one. As an apostolic (upci.org) Christian, I understand that the X in Xmas is the initial letter of the Greek word for Christ. That said, I still find it lazy usage. If you&#8217;re that keen on Greek, then write it all in Greek or stick to the standard english/american usage please!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cate</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2851</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2851</guid>
					<description>I hate to argue with you, because I really enjoy your blog.  HOWEVER -- Nigger has been a pejorative term for a long time (at least since the mid-1800's, according to http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/nigger.htm).   I understand that you don't like xmas, but there isn't really a case to be made for it being pejorative -- except that you don't like it.  As far as I know, xmas has never been used to denigrate Christmas or Christ -- it's just shorthand.   There's a big difference between shorthand and using a word to intentionally express disrespect.  At least to me, there is.

Thanks for your blog.  I especially appreciate your photo advice, and as a complete junkie for all things Japanese, I like learning about your life there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to argue with you, because I really enjoy your blog.  HOWEVER &#8212; Nigger has been a pejorative term for a long time (at least since the mid-1800&#8217;s, according to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/nigger.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/nigger.htm</a>).   I understand that you don&#8217;t like xmas, but there isn&#8217;t really a case to be made for it being pejorative &#8212; except that you don&#8217;t like it.  As far as I know, xmas has never been used to denigrate Christmas or Christ &#8212; it&#8217;s just shorthand.   There&#8217;s a big difference between shorthand and using a word to intentionally express disrespect.  At least to me, there is.</p>
<p>Thanks for your blog.  I especially appreciate your photo advice, and as a complete junkie for all things Japanese, I like learning about your life there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey Friedl</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2850</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2850</guid>
					<description>Yes, I know about how it was written in Greek, but we're not writing Greek a thousand years ago, we're writing English now. By your logic, "nigger" is a perfectly appropriate term for someone with black skin (because its roots lie in a term of comradery used among those forced into slavery in the US).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know about how it was written in Greek, but we&#8217;re not writing Greek a thousand years ago, we&#8217;re writing English now. By your logic, &#8220;nigger&#8221; is a perfectly appropriate term for someone with black skin (because its roots lie in a term of comradery used among those forced into slavery in the US).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cate</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2849</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2849</guid>
					<description>X was a historically common shorthand for Christ -- the greek letter Chi is written "X" and was the first letter of Christ's name in greek.  Read here (and in many other places) for more: http://www.cresourcei.org/symbols/xmasorigin.html

So "Xmas" is just shorthand -- appropriate shorthand -- for Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X was a historically common shorthand for Christ &#8212; the greek letter Chi is written &#8220;X&#8221; and was the first letter of Christ&#8217;s name in greek.  Read here (and in many other places) for more: <a href="http://www.cresourcei.org/symbols/xmasorigin.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cresourcei.org/symbols/xmasorigin.html</a></p>
<p>So &#8220;Xmas&#8221; is just shorthand &#8212; appropriate shorthand &#8212; for Christmas.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2844</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2844</guid>
					<description>Small world! I follow your blog via an RSS reader, and saw this post today. Tom Breen is someone my husband knows. I've read things of Breen's before he moved to West Virginia for AP, and he strikes me as a responsible journalist and writer. I would have to agree with the points both Derek and Bill mention, and add to that that writers often do not write their own headlines-- an editor will have that responsibility.

I thought the article itself was funny. If you take out a lighted baby Jesus and his parents, that makes the creche less religious? What reasoning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small world! I follow your blog via an RSS reader, and saw this post today. Tom Breen is someone my husband knows. I&#8217;ve read things of Breen&#8217;s before he moved to West Virginia for AP, and he strikes me as a responsible journalist and writer. I would have to agree with the points both Derek and Bill mention, and add to that that writers often do not write their own headlines&#8211; an editor will have that responsibility.</p>
<p>I thought the article itself was funny. If you take out a lighted baby Jesus and his parents, that makes the creche less religious? What reasoning!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2843</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2843</guid>
					<description>I have to agree with Derek.  Xmas isn't demeaning.  I believe it goes way, way, way back and stems from either X being symbolic of a cross or short for Χριστός (Greek for "Christ").</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Derek.  Xmas isn&#8217;t demeaning.  I believe it goes way, way, way back and stems from either X being symbolic of a cross or short for Χριστός (Greek for &#8220;Christ&#8221;).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Derek</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2842</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 16:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-12-03/297#comment-2842</guid>
					<description>Couple reasons:

[a] To a lot of people, "Christmas" isn't a religious holiday, or at least its "religious weight" is severely diminished. They just don't see anything worth getting worked up about
[b] To a newspaper editor, the length of a headline is important (not the "number of words" but the "number of characters") .. Given [a] above, it makes a lot of sense, where a headline is already getting wordy, to shorten it where possible, and "Christmas"-&#62;"Xmas" saves some space
[c] "X" isn't actually *insulting*. "nigger" for "black" is pejorative. "pig" for "cop" is pejorative. It's not like Christ is hanging around feeling insulted. There's a world of difference there.  Pejorative means "to have negative connotations", and frankly "Xmas" doesn't have negative connotations (see "[a]" above, most of the world doesn't really get worked up about it). It's not like "Xmas" is code for "Anti-Christmas" or something.

Now, if they'd used "giftmas" for "Christmas" (which, admittedly, I do more often than not, given the commercialization of a largely religious holiday), *that* might be considered to have a negative connotation and be pejorative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple reasons:</p>
<p>[a] To a lot of people, &#8220;Christmas&#8221; isn&#8217;t a religious holiday, or at least its &#8220;religious weight&#8221; is severely diminished. They just don&#8217;t see anything worth getting worked up about<br />
[b] To a newspaper editor, the length of a headline is important (not the &#8220;number of words&#8221; but the &#8220;number of characters&#8221;) .. Given [a] above, it makes a lot of sense, where a headline is already getting wordy, to shorten it where possible, and &#8220;Christmas&#8221;-&gt;&#8221;Xmas&#8221; saves some space<br />
[c] &#8220;X&#8221; isn&#8217;t actually *insulting*. &#8220;nigger&#8221; for &#8220;black&#8221; is pejorative. &#8220;pig&#8221; for &#8220;cop&#8221; is pejorative. It&#8217;s not like Christ is hanging around feeling insulted. There&#8217;s a world of difference there.  Pejorative means &#8220;to have negative connotations&#8221;, and frankly &#8220;Xmas&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have negative connotations (see &#8220;[a]&#8221; above, most of the world doesn&#8217;t really get worked up about it). It&#8217;s not like &#8220;Xmas&#8221; is code for &#8220;Anti-Christmas&#8221; or something.</p>
<p>Now, if they&#8217;d used &#8220;giftmas&#8221; for &#8220;Christmas&#8221; (which, admittedly, I do more often than not, given the commercialization of a largely religious holiday), *that* might be considered to have a negative connotation and be pejorative.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
