<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Photo-Tech Writeup: NEF Compression</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-10-10/265</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Farrell</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-10-10/265#comment-2600</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-10-10/265#comment-2600</guid>
					<description>I had turned this feature on for my D200 noticing that file sizes were pretty drastically reduced sometimes up to 50% and also because Aperture seemed ok loading them up. One annoying thing is the camera doesn't recognise this feature in it's 'frame capacity remaining' calculation, presumably because the compression is variable. It would be nice to get some approx figure though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had turned this feature on for my D200 noticing that file sizes were pretty drastically reduced sometimes up to 50% and also because Aperture seemed ok loading them up. One annoying thing is the camera doesn&#8217;t recognise this feature in it&#8217;s &#8216;frame capacity remaining&#8217; calculation, presumably because the compression is variable. It would be nice to get some approx figure though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
