<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got my D200!</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steven</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-2337</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-2337</guid>
					<description>Guys.. am contemplating on either getting the D 70S or D200. Which would be a better buy. Based on the looks and specs on the D200... its rocks! Even though its slightly heavier in terms of weight then the 70S. Please advise me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys.. am contemplating on either getting the D 70S or D200. Which would be a better buy. Based on the looks and specs on the D200&#8230; its rocks! Even though its slightly heavier in terms of weight then the 70S. Please advise me&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jenk</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-2105</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-2105</guid>
					<description>Yes, the d200 rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the d200 rocks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey Friedl</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-1044</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-1044</guid>
					<description>It sounds like you're getting a bum deal from wherever you ordered it. It's been a while since I've seen in the camera-site forums antying about a lack of product. I just took a peek on Y! Australia's shopping site and found places shipping D200s....

(As for a classs action against product announcements w/o products, watch out, as such a thing would cause Microsoft to go bankrupt!)

As far as Canon, they make fine cameras (my point-n-shoot has been a Canon for the last three generations). Just realize that when you pick a maker for an SLR, you're sort of getting married to it. The body may last a while, but the lenses and other stuff should last a lifetime, one would hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you&#8217;re getting a bum deal from wherever you ordered it. It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve seen in the camera-site forums antying about a lack of product. I just took a peek on Y! Australia&#8217;s shopping site and found places shipping D200s&#8230;.</p>
<p>(As for a classs action against product announcements w/o products, watch out, as such a thing would cause Microsoft to go bankrupt!)</p>
<p>As far as Canon, they make fine cameras (my point-n-shoot has been a Canon for the last three generations). Just realize that when you pick a maker for an SLR, you&#8217;re sort of getting married to it. The body may last a while, but the lenses and other stuff should last a lifetime, one would hope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-1043</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-1043</guid>
					<description>You are lucky - I have had a Nikon D200 on order here in Brisbane since middle of February and the latest word is - maybe mid May, maybe not. In the meantime potential clients just disappear because they are sick of waiting for me to actually get camera gear! Maybe we should start a class action against manufacturers who announce products they can't deliver. Should I buy a Canon instead? By the way, got the battery pack about two weeks after placing the order - seems less than fully thought out - seems to need removing from the camera body to access the three batteries so you can recharge them. Pretty lightweight plastic as well - not like the old F4 I had and loved. Of course the only batteries available are third party - Nikon doesn't even pretend to have supplies of those. Good luck with your new D200 - look after it, it may be hard to replace if you lose it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are lucky - I have had a Nikon D200 on order here in Brisbane since middle of February and the latest word is - maybe mid May, maybe not. In the meantime potential clients just disappear because they are sick of waiting for me to actually get camera gear! Maybe we should start a class action against manufacturers who announce products they can&#8217;t deliver. Should I buy a Canon instead? By the way, got the battery pack about two weeks after placing the order - seems less than fully thought out - seems to need removing from the camera body to access the three batteries so you can recharge them. Pretty lightweight plastic as well - not like the old F4 I had and loved. Of course the only batteries available are third party - Nikon doesn&#8217;t even pretend to have supplies of those. Good luck with your new D200 - look after it, it may be hard to replace if you lose it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: William</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-382</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-382</guid>
					<description>Yup, I'm a dinosaur.  I'm still hanging onto my two Maxxum 7 film bodies. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, I&#8217;m a dinosaur.  I&#8217;m still hanging onto my two Maxxum 7 film bodies. <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey Friedl</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-344</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-344</guid>
					<description>Oooh, excellent advice on the sequence number, thanks!   And I'll check out that 50mm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, excellent advice on the sequence number, thanks!   And I&#8217;ll check out that 50mm&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-343</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-10/130#comment-343</guid>
					<description>My two pieces of advice:  Get a Nikon AF-D 50mm f1.8 lens - I bet it's less than Y10000 - and set the "File No. Seq" setting to "On".  The 50mm f1.8 never goes out of style, although I'd prefer a slightly more expensive 35mm f2 on this camera, and if you don't hit that setting the camera will reset image sequence #'s to "1" constantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two pieces of advice:  Get a Nikon AF-D 50mm f1.8 lens - I bet it&#8217;s less than Y10000 - and set the &#8220;File No. Seq&#8221; setting to &#8220;On&#8221;.  The 50mm f1.8 never goes out of style, although I&#8217;d prefer a slightly more expensive 35mm f2 on this camera, and if you don&#8217;t hit that setting the camera will reset image sequence #&#8217;s to &#8220;1&#8243; constantly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
