<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My trip to see the Nikon D200</title>
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog, but sometimes I play one on TV</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127#comment-2367</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127#comment-2367</guid>
					<description>The compression of the NEF-files is really fast but prior to the compression they run a quantization step where you loose some data, especially in the highlights. So some do not want to compress their NEFs.

If you don't care about the (visually almost impossible to detect) loss of data, shoot compressed. If you are a RAW-purist, shoot uncompressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The compression of the NEF-files is really fast but prior to the compression they run a quantization step where you loose some data, especially in the highlights. So some do not want to compress their NEFs.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t care about the (visually almost impossible to detect) loss of data, shoot compressed. If you are a RAW-purist, shoot uncompressed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Simon Wren</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127#comment-630</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127#comment-630</guid>
					<description>Potentially crappy kit lens? I don't think so. Check out the review section at Fred Miranda's site to read real-world experiences and views on this and other lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Potentially crappy kit lens? I don&#8217;t think so. Check out the review section at Fred Miranda&#8217;s site to read real-world experiences and views on this and other lenses.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jr</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127#comment-333</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://regex.info/blog/2006-01-05/127#comment-333</guid>
					<description>The kit lens for the D70 is indeed slow and a little noisy. There are better lenses out there that aren't. 
I'm not sure about the D200, but i've got a small green dot in the bottom corner that tells me the image is focused. That said, I miss the split prism too, and it doesn't look like Nikon offers replacement focus screens with it.

Oh, and thanks for the dust ref suggestion. I'll have to try that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kit lens for the D70 is indeed slow and a little noisy. There are better lenses out there that aren&#8217;t.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure about the D200, but i&#8217;ve got a small green dot in the bottom corner that tells me the image is focused. That said, I miss the split prism too, and it doesn&#8217;t look like Nikon offers replacement focus screens with it.</p>
<p>Oh, and thanks for the dust ref suggestion. I&#8217;ll have to try that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
