<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Speak Like A President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70</link>
	<description>Not a photo blog. A personal blog with photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>There was a great moment for word-lovers at the 1976 Democratic national convention when the nomination speech for Jimmy Carter referred to his &quot;moral turpitude&quot; rather than &quot;moral rectitude&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a great moment for word-lovers at the 1976 Democratic national convention when the nomination speech for Jimmy Carter referred to his &#8220;moral turpitude&#8221; rather than &#8220;moral rectitude&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-643</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exceptional

Wow, you got them all correct!!!&quot;

Guess I should have been born in the 17th century ;)  Of course, knowing words is one thing; the skilled use of them, another entirely.

And as I may have mentioned, I taught vocabulary classes for two years for The Princeton Review.  The instructors used to offer prizes to students who brought them a word from a newspaper the instructor couldn&#039;t define correctly (with a few caveats:  no scientific words (though I did accept &quot;nictitating&quot; just to show off) or highly specialized jargon).

If anyone has (or is) a child approaching PSAT/SAT age, I&#039;d recommend professional preparation, even if they&#039;re doing well (in fact, especially if they&#039;re doing well, unless they&#039;re currently scoring 1550 or higher).  If that&#039;s not possible (it&#039;s perversely expensive), I&#039;d recommend they practice every single SAT question they can get their hands on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exceptional</p>
<p>Wow, you got them all correct!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Guess I should have been born in the 17th century <img src='http://regex.info/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Of course, knowing words is one thing; the skilled use of them, another entirely.</p>
<p>And as I may have mentioned, I taught vocabulary classes for two years for The Princeton Review.  The instructors used to offer prizes to students who brought them a word from a newspaper the instructor couldn&#8217;t define correctly (with a few caveats:  no scientific words (though I did accept &#8220;nictitating&#8221; just to show off) or highly specialized jargon).</p>
<p>If anyone has (or is) a child approaching PSAT/SAT age, I&#8217;d recommend professional preparation, even if they&#8217;re doing well (in fact, especially if they&#8217;re doing well, unless they&#8217;re currently scoring 1550 or higher).  If that&#8217;s not possible (it&#8217;s perversely expensive), I&#8217;d recommend they practice every single SAT question they can get their hands on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nils</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I missed one, &quot;aver.&quot; I read a lot as a kid. The word &quot;vicissitude&quot; always makes me laugh because we had this English blue-blood (a relative of Mountbatten)  nutjob writing about arts for our college newspaper, and he once used the word &quot;Vicissitudinous&quot; in a review. At the time it was the funniest thing ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed one, &#8220;aver.&#8221; I read a lot as a kid. The word &#8220;vicissitude&#8221; always makes me laugh because we had this English blue-blood (a relative of Mountbatten)  nutjob writing about arts for our college newspaper, and he once used the word &#8220;Vicissitudinous&#8221; in a review. At the time it was the funniest thing ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 06:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regex.info/blog/2005-09-13/70#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Wow, I did horrible.  This left me lacking all felicity and with much despondence.  I submit a  	supplication for additional such quizes in the future, regardless of any vicissitudes.

(BTW, I believe the reason Washington&#039;s first term was in 1789 wasn&#039;t due to the war&#039;s length, but the Articles of Confederation, which preceeded the Constitution.)

(BTW2, if you dig Washington, check out 1776.  Great read.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I did horrible.  This left me lacking all felicity and with much despondence.  I submit a  	supplication for additional such quizes in the future, regardless of any vicissitudes.</p>
<p>(BTW, I believe the reason Washington&#8217;s first term was in 1789 wasn&#8217;t due to the war&#8217;s length, but the Articles of Confederation, which preceeded the Constitution.)</p>
<p>(BTW2, if you dig Washington, check out 1776.  Great read.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

